LexisNexis Australia
  • Home
  • Features
  • Viewpoints
  • Law Update
  • Practice Management
  • Lawyer2B
  • Careers
  • CPD/CLE
  • Downtime
  • Subscribe
  • Legal Jobs
  • Top Stories
  • Deals
  • Appointments
  • Folklaw
  • International Spotlight
  • Special Reports
  • In-house
  • Profiles
  • Box Breakers
  • Opinion
  • Head to Head
  • Blogs
  • Top Cases
  • Top Legislation
  • Matters and Briefs
  • Skills & Education
  • Legal Careers Launchpad
  • Working Life
  • Alternative Careers
  • Best Practice
  • Human Resources
  • Risk Management
  •  
  • For Employers
  • For Employees
  •  
  •  
  • Search
  • Job Seeker Homepage
  • Set Email Alerts
LEGAL SEARCH
Search
     

Welcome

Sign in | Join
Opinion
  • Home
  • Contact

Subscriptions

Advertisement

Tags

  • allens arthur robinson
  • consumer protection
  • deacons
  • depression
  • electronic discovery
  • emissions
  • employment law
  • Enduring Power of Attorney
  • energy &amp
  • environmental law
  • evidence act
  • family law
  • federal court
  • foreign trade
  • Fosters
  • further education
  • gay rights
  • human rights
  • International Law
  • Law Council
  • law reform
  • mental health
  • opinion
  • Rio Tinto
  • rural

Syndication

  •    RSS for Opinion
  •    View all RSS Feeds

Recent Posts

  • Whose child is it anyway?

Archives

  • September 2010 (1)
  • August 2010 (1)
  • July 2010 (1)
  • February 2010 (3)
  • January 2010 (2)
  • December 2009 (1)
  • November 2009 (4)
  • October 2009 (3)
  • September 2009 (6)
  • August 2009 (5)
  • July 2009 (5)
  • June 2009 (4)
  • May 2009 (4)
  • April 2009 (1)
  • March 2009 (4)
  • February 2009 (2)
  • December 2008 (3)
  • November 2008 (4)
  • October 2008 (3)
  • September 2008 (3)
All Tags » family law
  • Whose child is it anyway?

    The children of same-sex couples will now be recognised as the "child of the person's spouse", replacing the term "product of the relationship". whilst the terminology is simpler to apply, problems are still posed with interpretation, writes Nathan Hodge.

    ...
    Published Tue, Dec 2 2008 7:42 AM by Lawyers Weekly
    Filed under: opinion, family law, gay rights, same-sex

Legal news | Legal newspaper | Law firm news | Legal information | Law news

Terms and Conditions | Privacy | About Lawyers Weekly | Advertising | Contact Us | About LexisNexis

Copyright © 2010 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.