LexisNexis Australia
  • Home
  • Features
  • Viewpoints
  • Law Update
  • Practice Management
  • Lawyer2B
  • Careers
  • CPD/CLE
  • Downtime
  • Subscribe
  • Legal Jobs
  • Top Stories
  • Deals
  • Appointments
  • Folklaw
  • International Spotlight
  • Special Reports
  • In-house
  • Profiles
  • Box Breakers
  • Opinion
  • Head to Head
  • Blogs
  • Top Cases
  • Top Legislation
  • Matters and Briefs
  • Skills & Education
  • Legal Careers Launchpad
  • Working Life
  • Alternative Careers
  • Best Practice
  • Human Resources
  • Risk Management
  •  
  • For Employers
  • For Employees
  •  
  •  
  • Search
  • Job Seeker Homepage
  • Set Email Alerts
LEGAL SEARCH
Search
     

Welcome

Sign in | Join
Top Cases
  • Home

Subscriptions

Advertisement

Tags

  • administrative law
  • constitutional law
  • contempt
  • contract
  • corporations
  • criminal law
  • criminal procedure
  • damages
  • defamation
  • duty of care
  • evidence
  • industrial law
  • intellectual property
  • interpretation
  • judicial review
  • legal practitioners
  • medicine
  • negligence
  • offences
  • practice and procedure
  • sentencing
  • statutes
  • tort
  • trade and commerce
  • trade practices

Syndication

  •    RSS for Top Cases
  •    View all RSS Feeds

Recent Posts

  • R v Kashani-Malaki
  • St Clair v Timtalla Pty Ltd
  • R v Hillier
  • Wing Cheong Li v R
  • Inverness Medical Switzerland GmbH v MDS Diagnostics Pty Ltd

Archives

  • September 2010 (2)
  • August 2010 (22)
  • July 2010 (21)
  • June 2010 (21)
  • May 2010 (20)
  • April 2010 (17)
  • March 2010 (22)
  • February 2010 (21)
  • January 2010 (8)
  • December 2009 (17)
  • November 2009 (17)
  • October 2009 (13)
  • September 2009 (11)
  • August 2009 (14)
  • July 2009 (10)
  • June 2009 (22)
  • May 2009 (28)
  • April 2009 (23)
  • March 2009 (53)
  • February 2009 (71)
  • January 2009 (12)
  • December 2008 (5)
  • November 2008 (59)
  • October 2008 (8)
All Tags » evidence
  • R v Kashani-Malaki

    A Brisbane man who was convicted of trafficking varioius dangerous drugs has been granted a retrial. The Queensland Supreme Court found that a "material irregularity" occurred in the man's trial because one of the members of the jury sent...
    Published Fri, Aug 27 2010 1:27 AM by Latest Cases
    Filed under: admissibility, criminal law, evidence, juries
  • St Clair v Timtalla Pty Ltd

    An injured pilot has been successful in his claim for damages against a company which failed to properly service a helicopter that crashed as the pilot was mustering cattle. The Supreme Court of Queensland ordered the company to pay $1.73m in damages...
    Published Thu, Aug 26 2010 2:08 AM by Latest Cases
    Filed under: damages, duty of care, evidence, negligence, personal injuries, aviation, civil aviation, general principles
  • R v Hillier

    The Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory has ordered a verdict of acquittal in the trial of a Canberra man, accused of murdering his former de facto partner. The court was not satisfied that the possibility of contamination or indirect transfer...
    Published Tue, Apr 20 2010 2:25 AM by Latest Cases
    Filed under: criminal law, evidence, trial, scientific
  • Wing Cheong Li v R

    The New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal has dismissed an appeal against a conviction for dealing with money which was the proceeds of crime and which the appellant believed to be proceeds of crime. The Crown case was that the money in question was...
    Published Thu, Mar 11 2010 11:29 PM by Latest Cases
    Filed under: criminal law, evidence, offences, hearsay
  • Inverness Medical Switzerland GmbH v MDS Diagnostics Pty Ltd

    The Federal Court has found pregnancy testing device manufacturer MDS Diagnostics to have infringed two patents owned by Inverness Medical Switzerland. Inverness Medical Switzerland was unsuccessful in two further claims due to lack of novelty. The managing...
    Published Sun, Feb 28 2010 11:32 PM by Latest Cases
    Filed under: admissibility, evidence, intellectual property, tort, patents, liability, hearsay
  • Kernahan v ACN 003 134 475 Pty Ltd

    The New South Wales Supreme Court has ruled that an APRA investigation report of a superannuation company was not admissible as prima facie evidence. It was found that the inspector wrongly delegated powers to a solicitor who was not a member of APRA's...
    Published Wed, Feb 17 2010 10:38 PM by Latest Cases
    Filed under: admissibility, evidence, superannuation, superannuation funds
  • Australian Securities & Investments Commission v Fortescue Metals Group Ltd (No 5)

    The Federal Court has rejected ASIC's claim that ASX listed company Fortescue Metals Group engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct. It was found that Fortescue's public disclosures concerning the binding nature of framework agreements were...
    Published Mon, Feb 1 2010 9:56 PM by Latest Cases
    Filed under: companies, corporations, evidence, general principles
  • Zhang v Commissioner, Australian Federal Police

    The Federal Court has granted an interlocutory injunction restraining the inspection of documents seized under search warrants. A serious question arose as to whether the documents were seized without proper regard to the terms of the search warrants...
    Published Mon, Oct 19 2009 12:41 AM by Latest Cases
    Filed under: administrative law, evidence, inspection, judicial review
  • R v Naa

    Admissions made during a police siege were admissible as they were not made in connection with an investigation of the commission of an offence. The admissions did not constitute questioning under the (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 s 139 as s 139 was not intended...
    Published Wed, Sep 9 2009 1:45 AM by Latest Cases
    Filed under: criminal law, criminal procedure, evidence, police and emergency services, criminal investigation, admissions
  • State of New South Wales v Fisk

    This judgment questions the decision of the New South Wales Supreme Court of Appeal in Tillman v Attorney-General (NSW) in relation to the construction of the word 'likely' in the (NSW) Crimes (Serious Sex Offenders) Act 2006 s 17. [2009] NSWSC...
    Published Fri, Aug 14 2009 1:06 AM by Latest Cases
    Filed under: criminal law, evidence, expert opinion, imprisonment
  • SKA v R; R v SKA

    An appellate court should not view video evidence but should proceed on the basis of the transcript of the video evidence alone. This would prevent the creation of an imbalance by exposure to visual images and oral recordings of one witness and not others...
    Published Mon, Jul 20 2009 12:32 AM by Latest Cases
    Filed under: criminal law, evidence, sentencing, witnesses, verdicts
  • R v H Waterhouse & Son Pty Ltd

    An operator of a pine treatment plant has failed to have its conviction for failure to provide and maintain a safe workplace overturned by the VSCA. The operator had argued that the trial judge's jury directions on the question of control were inadequate...
    Published Fri, Jun 12 2009 1:39 AM by Latest Cases
    Filed under: admissibility, evidence, industrial law, occupational health and safety
  • Walter Mining Pty Ltd v Hennessey

    The QSC considered the admissibility of witness evidence before the Coroner's Court. It held that the evidence of a witness with background in underground coal mining for 20 years met the test of opinion evidence and that no case was cited which held...
    Published Mon, May 11 2009 12:38 AM by Latest Cases
    Filed under: admissibility, evidence, coroners
  • Jones v R

    The HCA found the appellant was not prevented from leading evidence of an assault by the co-accused on the appellant's friend to establish the co-accused had a propensity for violence. The appellant sought to adduce hearsay evidence of the assault...
    Published Wed, Apr 29 2009 11:42 PM by Latest Cases
    Filed under: admissibility, criminal law, directions to jury, evidence
  • R v Benbrika (Rulings No 35.01-35.11)

    The VSC handed down various procedural rulings made during the respondents' trial for being members of a terrorist organisation. The court held that expert evidence was admissible on the effectiveness of directions for making explosives or incendiary...
    Published Fri, Apr 17 2009 12:57 AM by Latest Cases
    Filed under: criminal law, evidence, terrorism, expert opinion
1 2 Next >

Legal news | Legal newspaper | Law firm news | Legal information | Law news

Terms and Conditions | Privacy | About Lawyers Weekly | Advertising | Contact Us | About LexisNexis

Copyright © 2010 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.