find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Real Estate & Projects Lawyer (6+ years PAE)
Category: Property Law | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Top tier firm with offices nationally · High profile clients
View details
ACCC approves Singapore's ASX takeover

ACCC approves Singapore's ASX takeover

The competition regulator has cleared the proposed $8.4 billion merger of ASX Ltd and Singapore Exchange Ltd, saying the deal would not impede competition.

THE competition regulator has cleared the proposed $8.4 billion merger of ASX Ltd and Singapore Exchange Ltd, saying the deal would not impede competition.

"For the ACCC to oppose a merger, it must substantiate a lessening of competition that results from the proposed acquisition itself. The ACCC found that the proposed acquisition was not the cause of the concerns about access," the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission said in a statement.

In Australia, SGX does not compete with ASX for trading, clearing or settlement services, the ACCC said today.

While the ASX and SGX do compete for listing services, this is only to a limited extent, it said.

ClaytonUtz and Allen & Gledhill LLP confirmed in October they are acting on the proposedmerger. It isunderstood Freehills is also involved in the deal, advising the ASX.

ClaytonUtz is acting as legal advisers to Singapore Exchange (SGX) on its proposedmerger with ASX Ltd via scheme of arrangement, announced today.

Allen& Gledhill LLP are the Singapore legal advisers for the SGX.

ClaytonUtz corporate partners Rod Halstead and Karen Evans-Cullen are the firm's leadpartners, with banking partner Alex Schlosser advising on the financing of thetransaction.

The ACCC focused its investigation on whether the proposed acquisition would deter the entry of Chi-X Australia Pty Ltd (CXA) or Chi-East, because of a joint venture agreement which SGX has with Chi-X Global (CXG). SGX has a 50-50 joint venture with Chi-X Global to establish Chi-East.

Chi-East plans to offer an offshore "dark pool" that will list ASX listed securities. Dark pools provide electronic trading in securities where buy and sell orders are not transparent to the market.

Investors typically prefer to conduct trading in the dark when they are trading large volume of shares, as pre-trade transparency may result in price movements before the trade is completed.

CXG's wholly owned subsidiary CXA plans to establish a lit trading venue in Australia which would compete with ASX. All buy and sell orders are transparent on a "lit pool", the ACCC said.

"The ACCC found that the joint venture relationship between SGX and CXG would not alter CXA's incentives to establish a lit trading venue in Australia and noted that SGX has no economic interest in CXG," ACCC chairman Graeme Samuel said.

"Given SGX's 50 per cent ownership in Chi-East, the ACCC considered that the proposed acquisition may alter the economic incentives of Chi-East to compete with the merged entity. However, the ACCC found that the extent to which Chi-East and the ASX would compete in relation to dark pool trading services is limited.

“Market inquiries indicated that dark pools which are located offshore are unlikely to compete with dark pools located in Australia. Further, there are a number of dark pool providers who would continue to constrain a merged ASX/SGX,” Samuel said.

After extensive inquiries with a range of market participants, the ACCC said that the proposed acquisition was unlikely to result in a substantial lessening of competition.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017


ACCC approves Singapore's ASX takeover
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Aug 21 2017
Is your firm on the right track for gig economy gains?
Promoted by Crowd & Co. The way we do business, where we work, how we engage with workers, ev...
Scales of Justice, Victorian County Court, retiring judges
Aug 21 2017
Replacements named for retired Vic judges
Two new judicial officers have been appointed in the Victorian County Court, following the retire...
Applauds
Aug 21 2017
LCA applauds proposed Modern Slavery Act
The Law Council of Australia has welcomed new recommendations for the development of a Modern Slaver...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...