find the latest legal job
Legal Inhouse / Lawyer / Company Secretary
Category: Other | Location: Brisbane QLD 4000
· Fantastic Company · Potential to be Part Time / Flexible Work Pattern
View details
Part Time Risk & Compliance Officer
Category: Other | Location: Brisbane QLD 4000
· Brisbane City · Flexible Part Time Hours
View details
Infrastructure Lawyer/SA
Category: Construction Law | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Global elite law firm · Dedicated Infrastructure team
View details
In-House Legal Counsel (Mid to Senior)| Regulated Markets (Energy and Gas)
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Full PD on Request · Exciting High Impact Role
View details
Family Lawyer
Category: Family Law | Location: Eastern Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Boutique Firm · Great Reputation
View details
Maddocks, HG&R join action for rights activist

Maddocks, HG&R join action for rights activist

The Public Interest Law Clearing House (PILCH) coordinated the efforts of barristers and lawyers from Herbert Geer & Rundle and Maddocks to help defeat an actio

The Public Interest Law Clearing House (PILCH) coordinated the efforts of barristers and lawyers from Herbert Geer & Rundle and Maddocks to help defeat an action against animal rights activists sued for hindering trade under the secondary boycott provisions of the Trade Practices Act.

In Rural Export & Trading (WA) Pty Ltd v Hahnheuser [2007] FCA 1535, Acting Chief Justice Peter Gray found Ralph Hahnheuser’s placement of shredded ham in feed troughs to prevent the sheep being exported to the Middle East fell within the environmental protest exclusion in section 45DB of the Trade Practices Act.

Hahnheuser was sued along with Animal Liberation SA Inc by Rural Export & Trading (WA) and Samex Australian Meat Co Pty Ltd.

Animal Liberation was represented by Jim Delaney QC, Matthew Barrett of counsel and Henrik Lassen at Herbert Geer & Rundle. Just before the trial, the applicants and respondent agreed the action against Animal Liberation should be dismissed.

Justine Lau at Maddocks, Garry Bigmore QC, Matt Connock SC and Edward Moon acted for Ralph Hanheuser.

Harwood Andrews advised counsel for the applicants.

“It was an interesting test case. The secondary boycott provisions were introduced as part of Peter Reith’s industrial relations reforms and were directed towards preventing coordinated industrial action,” Matthew Barrett said.

“The applicants in this case, however, were trying to use the provision to sue animal rights protestors for damages. The result seems more consistent with the initial purpose of the section.”

In his defence, Hahnheuser said the Trade Practices Act allows for boycotts if it is for the purpose of protecting the environment, and his conduct was aimed at environmental protection not industrial action.

He said the dominant purpose was to: “protect sheep from cruelty and suffering as a result of live transport by ship to, and arrival in, the Middle East and also to increase public awareness and education of the suffering and cruelty suffered by sheep during live transport by ship”.

Justice Gray agreed with his view, and said there were two additional obstacles to the applicant’s claims.

“[Rural Export] trade and commerce was not prevented or substantially hindered by anything that Mr Hahnheuser did and, in any event, the trade and commerce in which it engaged relevantly was not trade or commerce involving the movement of goods between Australia and places outside Australia.”

Tabith Lovett, manager at PILCH, said there was “a strong suspicion the proceedings were designed not to recover damages but to deter protest against live export trade”.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Maddocks, HG&R join action for rights activist
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Anti-radicalisation programs playing ‘second fiddle’ to terrorism laws
Several academics have questioned the balance between Australia’s counterterrorism legislation and...
 William Ah Ket
‘Bamboo ceiling’ thought piece wins inaugural law prize
A paper that explores the idea of affirmative action to achieve greater diversity among members of A...
Nov 22 2017
Reduced investment protections will make robust commercial arbitration mechanisms all the more critical for investors
Promoted by Maxwell Chambers. This article discusses the current trend away from investor protect...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...