find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Incitec deal cultivated

Incitec deal cultivated

Clayton Utz and Freehills have worked on the institutional sell-down of part of majority shareholder Orica Limited’s 70 per cent stake in Incitec Pivo

Clayton Utz and Freehills have worked on the institutional sell-down of part of majority shareholder Orica Limited’s 70 per cent stake in Incitec Pivot Limited (IPL), and the proposed buy-back by IPL of Orica’s remaining shareholding. Clayton Utz advised IPL, led by partner Charles Rosedale, while Freehills advised Orica, led by Rodd Levy.

The separation of the businesses was achieved through Orica’s institutional placement of 56.5 per cent of its shareholding and IPL’s proposed selective buy-back of Orica’s remaining 13.5 per cent stake, all at $21 a share. The placement, which netted sale proceeds of $692 million was underwritten by Macquarie Equity Capital Markets.

The buy-back is still subject to shareholder approval. Rosedale said the transaction required a coordinated approach from the Clayton Utz team, which was drawn from across the Melbourne practice, with both new and existing arrangements between the two companies creating a range of complex legal issues.

“It was necessary to align the proposed share buy-back with the sell-down because Orica was the majority stakeholder in IPL and it had been responsible for a lot of the infrastructure that a listed company would normally set up itself,” he said. “The separation out of IPL required us to document the transition period within which IPL would be required to source its new infrastructure as well as re-document the two-way product supply arrangements between the two companies.”

Developing the mechanism to have that flow-on buy-back integrate properly with the sell-down was one of the more challenging elements of the deal. “The critical thing there was the maximum amount which Incitec was going to apply to the buy-back cap of $165 million.”

So far there have been few market sell-downs of this type by a controlling shareholder, Rosedale said, namely because there is no provision in the Corporations Act for such a transaction to occur. Both companies had to obtain ASIC relief for the transaction to take place without a prospectus.

He said the transaction would likely signal opportunities for similar transactions by controlling shareholders, by increasing awareness in the equity capital markets that a sell-down can be made without a prospectus, as long as that ASIC relief is obtained. Both Orica and Incitec had to ensure they were fully disclosing to the market all the price sensitiveinformation at the time of the sell-down.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Incitec deal cultivated
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...