find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
The media, the litigation and the takeover

The media, the litigation and the takeover

“More twists and turns than a zig-zag railway” is how one lawyer described the Toll/Patrick deal. Possibly the most talked about and most litigious takeover ever, it involved a…

“More twists and turns than a zig-zag railway” is how one lawyer described the Toll/Patrick deal. Possibly the most talked about and most litigious takeover ever, it involved a veritable posse of lawyers from four different firms. Clayton Utz represented Toll Holdings, while lawyers from Allens Arthur Robinson, Arnold Bloch Leibler and Johnson Winter & Slattery joined forces on Patrick’s defence against the bid.

Rod Lyle led Clayton Utz’s team on the marathon transaction, while AAR’s Andrew Clarke, ABL’s Leon Zwier and JWS’s John Kench headed up teams from their respective firms. The takeover bid, which began in August last year, was consistently hostile, consistently in the press, and resulted in Toll making an offer $1.6 billion more than its original approach.

While no one from the Patrick team is regarding the outcome as a defeat, Clayton Utz’s Lyle said no one at Toll considers the significantly higher outlay to be a ‘loss’. “Paul Little [Toll managing director] has said publicly on a number of occasions that Toll was prepared to pay a premium for the directors’ unanimous recommendations,” he said.

“In any takeover, directors’ recommendations are worth something, but sometimes they are worth more than at other times. On this occasion, they were certainly worth something.”

Lyle said the intense media scrutiny and the sheer longevity of the deal added to the pressure for all concerned, but congratulated his team on its “endurance, determination and skill”.

For Patrick, AAR provided the M&A and overall strategy advice, ABL carried out the seven separate pieces of litigation involved and JWS advised on the ACCC issues. But AAR’s Clarke was quick to credit Patrick’s general counsel, William Hara, and of course Chris Corrigan, for the “sparks of genius” that characterised the bid defence.

“Those sparks all originated from within the company. It was our challenge to keep those sparks working consistently well, despite what the ACCC and Toll threw at us,” he said.

Clarke, who was assisted on the deal by Richard Kriedemann, Tom Story and Andrew Wong, said the time taken to complete the deal and its intensity set the transaction apart from others he has worked on. “It had more twists and turns than a zig-zag railway,” he said. “Takeovers always take longer than people think but they don’t all go for as long and with such intensity as this one. Most have commercial intensity, but this one was extremely legally intensive, with a disproportionate emphasis on legal strategy.”

While most takeovers are fought “purely on value”, Clarke said this one was fought on a number of unusual fronts, including whether or not the bidder was actually able to do what it was trying to do. The legal component of the strategy significantly increased the uncertainty of the bid, Clarke said, which was a deliberate result.

ABL’s Zwier said it was very unusual for a takeover to feature seven pieces of litigation. “I live and breathe litigation, but an ordinary transaction is handled by one M&A firm and generally M&A partners drive that transaction,” he said.

“My own view is that when you bring in strategic litigants, it brings a new dimension to the M&A transaction because we scour what’s going on in terms of what opportunities there are to enforce strict legal rights.”

He said the bid defence was orchestrated by Hara “the masterful” Corrigan and Peter Scanlon. He pointed to the fact that Corrigan and Scanlon both came up through the ranks in the 1980s when takeovers were constantly being fought in the courts.

Zwier said the transaction was a “sensational” one to be involved in, with great camaraderie between the lawyers from the three firms, and a client that was “highly sophisticated, incredibly quick and very smart”.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

The media, the litigation and the takeover
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Lawyers slam rushed consultation for SA repeat offenders bill
The Law Society of South Australia has expressed concern for a proposal to roll out new laws amendin...
The pursuit of happiness in the law
A panel of legal experts have explored how to define success in the legal profession, and how lawyer...
Queensland University of Technology, ruby milestone
Queensland law school reaches ruby milestone
Celebrating 40 years since establishing a law course in 1977, the Queensland University of Technolog...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...