find the latest legal job
Corporate/Commercial Lawyers (2-5 years PAE)
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Specialist commercial law firm · Long-term career progression
View details
Graduate Lawyer / Up to 1.5 yr PAE Lawyer
Category: Personal Injury Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Mentoring Opportunity in Regional QLD · Personal Injury Law
View details
Corporate and Commercial Partner
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Full time · Join a leading Adelaide commercial law firm
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Sydney NSW
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
Lawyer struck off for ‘social media blitz’ against judge

Lawyer struck off for ‘social media blitz’ against judge

gavel

A change.org petition set up by Louisiana lawyer Nanine McCool to influence court proceedings has left a panel of state Supreme Court judges deeply unimpressed.

Ms McCool lost her licence to practice after losing her cool and launching a zealous social media campaign against judges presiding over a state family court custody battle.

In a judgment handed down on 30 June, Justice Scott Crichton remarked that Ms McCool showed “outrageous disregard for the sacred profession” and “repugnant disrespect for the system”.

“Perhaps [Ms McCool’s] most astounding and egregious action is her complete and utter lack of remorse,” Justice Crichton said.

In 2011 Ms McCool assisted a friend who was fighting for custody of her two children.

Unhappy with the court’s decision, the pair set up a petition on change.org criticising Judge Dawn Amacker and Judge Deborah Gambrell.

Ms McCool posted the petition on her blog site and promoted it in other articles. She also shared the judges’ contact details and encouraged supporters to actively lobby the court.

The petition claimed that the judges had failed to protect the two children by ignoring evidence of sexual abuse by the father and granting him unsupervised visitation rights.

Ms McCool spread “numerous false, misleading and inflammatory statements” online about the handling of the case, according to the ruling.

Turning to Twitter, Ms McCool wrote disparaging statements about the judges involved in the pending case and linked to her petition.

“Judges are supposed to know shit about … the law … aren‘t they? And like evidence and shit? Due process?” she tweeted. “Shouldn‘t judges base decisions about kids on evidence?”

At the time, Judge Amacker had her assistant respond to the petition by cautioning against ex parte communications with a judge.

According to the recent Louisiana Supreme Court ruling, Ms McCool should have used the appeals process rather than launching a “social media blitz” to challenge court decisions.

“[Ms McCool] cannot confuse a First Amendment claim of the right to free speech with a serious and intentional violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct,” said Justice Crichton.

"Not only did her conduct cause major disruptions in the course of litigation, it also unnecessarily put members of the judiciary at risk.”

Going to war

But the story didn’t end there. In 2014 Ms McCool launched a campaign to unseat Judge Amacker by running for the position herself.

This must have been the final straw for the beleaguered judge, who finally filed a formal complaint against her opponent.

None of the other 11 incumbent judges for the 22nd Judicial District Court of Louisiana bench were challenged.

Judge Amacker crushed Ms McCool in the election and, rubbing salt in the wound, saw her complaint lead to the lawyer’s disbarment.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Lawyer struck off for ‘social media blitz’ against judge
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Dec 11 2017
Warm welcome for new district court judges
Three practitioners who were appointed as district court judges in WA have been congratulated by ...
Lawyers welcome same-sex marriage reform
Dec 11 2017
Lawyers welcome same-sex marriage reform
Australian lawyers have welcomed the recent legalisation of same-sex marriage, after a prolonged nat...
Senate disallows double standards for temporary visa holders
Dec 8 2017
Senate disallows double standards for temporary visa holders
Lawyers have welcomed the Senate’s rejection of regulations imposing strict penalties on temporary...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...