find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Lawyer struck off for ‘social media blitz’ against judge

Lawyer struck off for ‘social media blitz’ against judge


A petition set up by Louisiana lawyer Nanine McCool to influence court proceedings has left a panel of state Supreme Court judges deeply unimpressed.

Ms McCool lost her licence to practice after losing her cool and launching a zealous social media campaign against judges presiding over a state family court custody battle.

In a judgment handed down on 30 June, Justice Scott Crichton remarked that Ms McCool showed “outrageous disregard for the sacred profession” and “repugnant disrespect for the system”.

“Perhaps [Ms McCool’s] most astounding and egregious action is her complete and utter lack of remorse,” Justice Crichton said.

In 2011 Ms McCool assisted a friend who was fighting for custody of her two children.

Unhappy with the court’s decision, the pair set up a petition on criticising Judge Dawn Amacker and Judge Deborah Gambrell.

Ms McCool posted the petition on her blog site and promoted it in other articles. She also shared the judges’ contact details and encouraged supporters to actively lobby the court.

The petition claimed that the judges had failed to protect the two children by ignoring evidence of sexual abuse by the father and granting him unsupervised visitation rights.

Ms McCool spread “numerous false, misleading and inflammatory statements” online about the handling of the case, according to the ruling.

Turning to Twitter, Ms McCool wrote disparaging statements about the judges involved in the pending case and linked to her petition.

“Judges are supposed to know shit about … the law … aren‘t they? And like evidence and shit? Due process?” she tweeted. “Shouldn‘t judges base decisions about kids on evidence?”

At the time, Judge Amacker had her assistant respond to the petition by cautioning against ex parte communications with a judge.

According to the recent Louisiana Supreme Court ruling, Ms McCool should have used the appeals process rather than launching a “social media blitz” to challenge court decisions.

“[Ms McCool] cannot confuse a First Amendment claim of the right to free speech with a serious and intentional violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct,” said Justice Crichton.

"Not only did her conduct cause major disruptions in the course of litigation, it also unnecessarily put members of the judiciary at risk.”

Going to war

But the story didn’t end there. In 2014 Ms McCool launched a campaign to unseat Judge Amacker by running for the position herself.

This must have been the final straw for the beleaguered judge, who finally filed a formal complaint against her opponent.

None of the other 11 incumbent judges for the 22nd Judicial District Court of Louisiana bench were challenged.

Judge Amacker crushed Ms McCool in the election and, rubbing salt in the wound, saw her complaint lead to the lawyer’s disbarment.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Lawyer struck off for ‘social media blitz’ against judge
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Oct 20 2017
Podcast: One of law’s most infamous alumni – in conversation with Julian Morrow
In this episode of The Lawyers Weekly Show, Melissa Coade is joined by The Chaser’s Julian Morrow....
Oct 20 2017
High Court overturns ‘excessive’ anti-protest legislation
Bob Brown’s recent victory in the High Court over the Tasmanian government was a win for fundament...
Oct 20 2017
Changes to Australian citizenship laws blocked
Attempts to beef up the requirements to obtain Australian citizenship were thwarted this week, after...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...