find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (1-3 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Sydney NSW 2000
· Join a dynamic Firm · Excellent career growth opportunity
View details
In-house lawyer 1-4 PAE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Leading Brand · Report to a Dynamic Legal Counsel
View details
Campaign against banks aims for regulatory change

Campaign against banks aims for regulatory change

A NATIONWIDE campaign by the Consumer Action Law Centre in conjunction with CHOICE is targeting bank fees in the hope it might lead to regulatory changeThe “Fair Go On Fees”…

A NATIONWIDE campaign by the Consumer Action Law Centre in conjunction with CHOICE is targeting bank fees in the hope it might lead to regulatory change

The “Fair Go On Fees” campaign, launched last week, advises customers how they can challenge bank fees that are incurred in instances such as when a credit card limit is exceeded or they don’t have enough money to cover direct debit or cheque payments. The fees charged by the banks in each instance can be up to $50.

Nicole Rich from the Consumer Action Law Centre said they believe the fees are probably unlawful because they are out of proportion to the costs incurred by the bank in processing the transaction.

“The legal issue is that we think these fees are penalties at law and in any case are unfair and excessive. We also think it raises other issues such as unconscionable conduct in enforcing terms that are put there unilaterally and impose excessive fees. And there’s also an argument in Victoria that the term in the contract imposing the fee would be an unfair term because we now have unfair contract term laws in Victoria under Part 2B of the Fair Trading Act which are modelled on the UK’s unfair contract terms laws. So we’ve made all of those legal arguments,” she said.

According to the Reserve Bank’s bulletin published in May, banks and credit unions charged households over $4 billion in fees last year, including hundreds of millions in penalty fees.

“If it was any other industry the company would have to write to you and say ‘you owe us these fees — pay up’ and you might have a fight at that point. But because the banks have people’s accounts they just obviously directly take it out of the account so it puts the onus on the individual customer to mount a challenge if they want to reclaim the fees. So it’s pretty hard for individuals. Who is going to run a legal action for $50 fee against a bank?,” Rich said.

Rich acknowledges ultimately a court would have to decide whether the fees were classed as penalties or not and that the potential costs of litigation make it unlikely an individual could mount a test case. However, she hopes the campaign may prompt some sort of legislative response that would give one of the regulatory bodies the power to investigate the fees.

“After the Wallace Inquiry into financial services the government set up three regulatory bodies — APRA doing prudential regulation, ASIC doing financial services regulation and the ACCC does general market competition regulation. Nobody is responsible for bank fees or fair fees or for financial affordability or any of those broader issues.

“This law of penalties is a case law principle. It’s quite well-established but nevertheless it’s common law. Government bodies tend to derive their authority from statutes and get their authority from statutes while the courts administer common law. So while consumers have the right to take their own legal action, none of the regulatory bodies has the power to do that,” Rich said.

The Family First Party has announced its intention to introduce a Bill putting an end to high bank fees.

Ian Gilbert, Australian Banker Association (ABA) director, retail regulatory policy, said he doubted the validity of many of the consumer groups’ legal arguments.

“It’s the consumer groups that are saying that all these fees are ‘penalties’ and therefore unenforceable but only a court is able to make that judgment on the facts of each case. The central point underpinning the consumer groups’ claims is that the present law doesn’t need to be changed if what they are claiming is legally correct. But what they haven’t made clear is how they reached the point of making that allegation, as a court when assessing whether the fee was a penalty would have to approach the question on the particular facts before it. For example, a court is unlikely to declare as a ‘penalty’ a term in customer’s contract that says that the bank may allow the customer to overdraw their account, which many banks do. But there may be a fee associated with that overdrawing. Examples like this expose the flaw in the consumer groups’ wide-ranging claim,” he said.

The ABA made an announcement last week saying it was committed to providing the community more information on exception fees following discussions with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Campaign against banks aims for regulatory change
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Unite
Aug 22 2017
Professionals unite in support of marriage equality
The presidents of representative bodies for solicitors, barristers and doctors in NSW have come toge...
Aug 21 2017
Is your firm on the right track for gig economy gains?
Promoted by Crowd & Co. The way we do business, where we work, how we engage with workers, ev...
Scales of Justice, Victorian County Court, retiring judges
Aug 21 2017
Replacements named for retired Vic judges
Two new judicial officers have been appointed in the Victorian County Court, following the retire...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...