find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
ASIC maintains powers under High Court rulings

ASIC maintains powers under High Court rulings

TWO SEPARATE constitutional challenges to the powers of Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) have been unanimously dismissed by the High Court of Australia. The Court found…

TWO SEPARATE constitutional challenges to the powers of Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) have been unanimously dismissed by the High Court of Australia.

The Court found ASIC had not breached the constitution by either banning an individual from being a director or cancelling or suspending a liquidator’s registration.

In one case, company director Milan Visnic took ASIC to court over its use of s 206F of the Corporations Act — the power to disqualify persons from managing a corporation — arguing that only a court could exercise such a power. For ASIC to disqualify him would therefore be unconstitutional, he claimed. Visnic had been banned by ASIC from managing a corporation for five years on 30 January 2006, after an investigation into 14 failed companies.

The High Court — in a joint judgment of six justices and a separate concurring judgment from Justice Kirby — rejected Visnic’s claim. The Court held that considerations of policy are important to the exercise of s 206F, and as such, ASIC’s use of the power is not judicial in nature. Section 206F empowers ASIC to determine whether to disqualify a person from managing a corporation by reference to criteria, including public interest, the Court said.

The other case involved a unanimous dismissal of separate appeals by two Sydney liquidators, heard together, after the Federal Court upheld ASIC’s decision to suspend their registration.

The liquidators, Vanda Russell Gould and Richard Albarran, originally claimed ASIC had misused s 1292 of the Corporations Act — which confers a power on the Companies Auditors and Liquidators Disciplinary Board (CALDB) to cancel or suspend a liquidator’s registration — as it was an unconstitutional application of a judicial power.

Also delivering a joint judgment by six justices and a separate judgment by Justice Kirby, the High Court held that the CALDB should determine whether functions and duties had been carried out or performed adequately and properly by reference to professional standards.

This function does not involve the ascertainment or enforcement of any existing right or liability in respect of an offence or the punishment for an offence, and so there was no improper exercise of judicial power.

What the CALDB should be doing, the Court held, is to uphold the standards of registered liquidators, ensure their compliance with an adequate and proper performance of their duties, and protect company shareholders, creditors, officers and employees, and the public.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

ASIC maintains powers under High Court rulings
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Scales of Justice
Aug 16 2017
Urgent criminal law reforms can prevent ‘unwarranted acquittals’
Concerns about unfair prejudice arising from the use of tendency and coincidence evidence are mispla...
Aug 15 2017
Press Control-S on your firm
Promoted by BHL Software It’s now a truism that when your IT systems stop working, so does you...
Aug 15 2017
The Importance of Leadership Skills for Aspiring Lawyers
Promoted by LHD Lawyers Even the most prominent lawyers of our age (or ages past, for that matter...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...