find the latest legal job
Part Time Risk & Compliance Officer
Category: Other | Location: Brisbane QLD 4000
· Brisbane City · Flexible Part Time Hours
View details
Infrastructure Lawyer/SA
Category: Construction Law | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Global elite law firm · Dedicated Infrastructure team
View details
Property Lawyer
Category: Property Law | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· 12 Month Contract · Diverse Work
View details
In-House Legal Counsel (Mid to Senior)| Regulated Markets (Energy and Gas)
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Full PD on Request · Exciting High Impact Role
View details
Family Lawyer
Category: Family Law | Location: Eastern Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Boutique Firm · Great Reputation
View details
Government accepts Cole Inquiry 1,2,3

Government accepts Cole Inquiry 1,2,3

THE FEDERAL Government has accepted the first three recommendations of the Cole Inquiry into the UN Oil-for-Food scandal with some limitations and additions.The government’s response follows the…

THE FEDERAL Government has accepted the first three recommendations of the Cole Inquiry into the UN Oil-for-Food scandal with some limitations and additions.

The government’s response follows the tabling on 27 November 2006 of the Report of the Inquiry into Certain Australian Companies in Relation to the UN Oil-for-Food Programme by Commissioner Terence Cole QC.

But having in substance agreed with the three recommendations concerning the enforcement of UN sanctions, the government refused to support a strict liability and 10 year prison sentence for individuals who act contrary to UN sanctions, as suggested by Cole.

The first of Cole’s recommendations asked for a prescribed form to be signed by a senior executive requesting permission to export wheat. He urged that the provision of false or misleading material in, or recklessly omitting material from, the prescribed form be made an offence.

The government agreed to establish the prescribed form, increase financial penalties, and make a criminal offence — punishable with up to 10 years in jail — for individuals who sign a false or misleading form or are otherwise complicit in the provision of false or misleading information.

In regard to recommendation two, the government, while accepting the need to criminalise conduct which breaches UN sanction regimes, chose to impose a strict liability on corporations but not individuals.

“The government considers that it is neither fair, nor useful, to subject individuals to 10 years imprisonment for unintended actions or unforeseen consequences unless these resulted from an unjustifiable risk, that is, recklessness,” the government response said.

“Accordingly, the offence for conduct that breaches a UN sanction will require proof of fault where individuals are concerned.”

Recommendation three suggested amending the fact that no body is empowered to obtain evidence and information to review compliance with UN sanctions.

The government will address this regulatory shortfall by empowering “various agencies responsible for granting permits in relation to UN sanctions” with the ability to conduct due diligence, monitor compliance and single out possible breaches of the law.

The government also claimed it has exceeded the inquiry’s recommendations by proposing additional legislative changes to statutes that govern tax deductions and foreign bribery.

These include amending the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA) to prevent deductibility of facilitation payments, except in the case of minor payments, which will be more closely aligned with provisions in the Criminal Code.

Division 70 (Foreign Bribery) of the Criminal Code, and the corresponding provision of the ITAA, will also be amended so the defence in s 70.3 “applies only where the law of the foreign country states that the advantage in question is permitted or required and that the offence can be made out regardless of the results of the payment or the alleged necessity of the payment”.

These additional changes came from comments made by Cole in the report, but not from specific recommendations.

Responses to recommendation four — referring to legal professional privilege (LPP) in royal commission proceedings — and recommendation five — relating to wheat export marketing arrangements — have been delayed until the necessary inquiries have been completed.

The Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) was requested to engage in an inquiry on LPP in November last year, and their report is due in December 2007. The ALRC was asked to examine “[LPP] and its impact on all Commonwealth bodies, including royal commissions, that have coercive information gathering or associated power.”

In regard to wheat export marketing arrangements, the government appointed a Wheat Export Marketing Consultation Committee in January, which released a report in late March that will form the basis of a response from the government on future wheat export arrangements.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Government accepts Cole Inquiry 1,2,3
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Law Council of Australia
06:04
LCA calls for urgent adoption of ‘game-changing’ recommendation
The Law Council of Australia has urged for the immediate adoption of a key recommendation put forwar...
Sally Wheeler
Nov 20 2017
ANU College of Law appoints new dean
A distinguished legal academic and the former head of law of a higher education institution in Irela...
Violence
Nov 17 2017
It's time for politicians to commit to eradicating domestic violence
The national shame of domestic violence cannot be left unaddressed, writes Christine Smyth. ...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...