find the latest legal job
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Solicitor - Insurance and Health
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Newcastle NSW 2300
· Dynamic organisation · Outstanding career opportunity
View details
Solicitors Barrister and Registered Migration Agents
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· We are an established multi-disciplinary practice located in North Sydney. ·
View details
Commercial/Projects Lawyer (4+ PAE)
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Fantastic, supportive working environment · Wide variety of work, direct client contact
View details
In-house Property Lawyer - 2-4 year PQE | Dynamic High Impact Role
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Melbourne VIC 3004
· Large multi-disciplinary in-house team
View details
Former A-G joins Sparkes

Former A-G joins Sparkes

The immediate past NSW Attorney-General has joined Sparke Helmore Lawyers as a consultant

.

John Hatzistergos, who was Attorney-General from 2007 to 2011, is leaving politics behind to take up the position with the firm’s government group.

Sparke Helmore has a strong government practice, with clients at local, state and federal government levels.

Despite this, Hatzistergos told Lawyers Weekly that his new role is unlikely to see him come face to face with officials he worked with as A-G.

“I’ll be working in the administrative law section of Sparkes and I’ll be working with [chairman] Phillip Salem and his team, essentially as a commercial adviser and a litigator,” said Hatzistergos.

Hatzistergos’s political career spanned over a decade and included ministerial positions in the portfolios of Citizenship, Regulatory Reform, Industrial Relations, Education, Justice, Health, Fair Trading and Commerce.

Despite being widely regarded as the most substantial figure left standing in the ranks of the NSW Labor Opposition following the party’s election loss last year, Hatzistergos said he has never considered himself a career politician.

In May, at the age of 50, he resigned despite having four years left to run.

“I went into parliament effectively viewing it as a period of service and I thought that it was time in my own life that I move on and enable myself to be refreshed and go back into something that has been a very large part of my working life,” Hatzistergos said.

Before entering parliament, he worked as a lawyer and barrister, in both private practice and the public sector.

Upon commencing with Sparkes in January, Hatzistergos said he noticed two significant differences since he was last actively practising law some years ago.

“The first was changes in technology that have affected not only the way you do work but also the way your clients do work and the way matters come to you,” he said, adding that he had to make “a significant investment in time” and training to “come to grips with a whole advancement of legal practice” in terms of various technologies.

Hatzistergos also has a part-time professorial position at the University of Technology, Sydney, which he said has helped him keep up-to-date with research engine technology.

“These days, clients, especially in the government section, are extremely well informed because governments now have legal departments of their own with high levels of expertise, and access to information is high due to modern technologies,” he said.

But Hatzistergos is confident his experience in government will give him an edge when assisting with client disputes.

“Government is a very unique client. It operates in a different environment and has significant public responsibilities … I understand the working environment of government agencies and the interaction between government agencies in the federal system,” he said.

Conflict of interest?

In the USA, senior government ministers who leave government service can be subject to conflict of interest restrictions commonly referred to as “revolving door” laws, which prevent them from working in the private sector.

Senior federal ministers can be subject to one and two-year “cooling off” periods on lobbying and advocacy communications to their former agency.

Hatzistergos rejected the notion that there was a conflict of interest in his new role at Sparkes and said there are "established rules in place [in Australia and in NSW] that deal with post-separation employment and conflicts of interest for lawyers, in general, and also for former government employees”.

“I believe those rules work quite well,” he said.

Last year, the NSW Law Society released the second edition of Guidance on Ethical Issues for Government Solicitors (the Guide), which details The Professional Conduct and Practice Rules and Public Sector Codes of Conduct.

“I’ve been a lawyer all my life ... The work I’m doing here [at Sparkes] is for government clients. It’s not as if I’m using any information that I have acquired against the government,” said Hatzistergos.

“There is a model litigant policy which operates in relation to government work and lawyers who do government work are expected to follow those directions.

But there are broad responsibilities on lawyers over and above that … those rules are the product of a long period of experience and they’re subject to ongoing training through CLE.”

During his time as A-G, Hatzistergos’s main interaction with lawyers was through professional associations like the NSW Law Society and Bar Association.

“From time to time there were more specialist bodies that had interests that wanted to come and talk to me, but they tended to be associations; environment lawyers, crown prosecutors, legal aid,” he said, adding that he virtually had no interaction with private legal firms.

While Hatzistergos admitted he is looking forward to practising law again, he said he expected to miss public life “more and more” as time goes by.

“There’s much in public life that I did that I’m very proud of ... but I think [missing public life] is a good thing, because you don’t want to leave a job with a sense that you wasted your time or that you have bitterness or negative feelings,” he said.

“It’s much better to leave public life with feelings of achievement, of fulfilment and that you did something you really enjoyed – and that’s the way that I would prefer to leave public life.”

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Chain
Jul 21 2017
Podcast: Combating modern slavery
In this episode of The Lawyers Weekly Show, Tom Lodewyke is joined by Veronica Rios, the executive m...
Businessmen and women
Jul 20 2017
Women outnumber men in legal profession
A report has found that women outnumbered men in the Australian legal profession in 2016 for the fir...
Leadership, manager, boss, leader, team members
Jul 20 2017
Do we have a leadership crisis in law?
Do you work for a ‘pacesetter’, the partner who rewrites perfectly fine reports, has little posi...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...