find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Allens, Slater & Gordon debate local impact of UK court decision

Allens, Slater & Gordon debate local impact of UK court decision

Law firms are alarmed by the potential impact a UK Supreme Court decision could have on the way expert witnesses are treated in Australian courts.


Slater & Gordon partner Bill Madden argues the March decision in Jones v Kaney in London could open up the door to medical and other expert witnesses who are negligent in their testimony being sued.


“The decision marks a significant shift away from the protection medical experts are given in UK and Australian courts,” Madden said.


Allens Arthur Robinson partner Michael Quinlan and senior associate Joanne Howie said it will be interesting to see whether this decision in the UK will impact on the immunity of expert witnesses in Australia, should a disgruntled litigant seek to sue its expert in Australia in the future.


"Some see this as a healthy development in the expert's ultimate task of assisting the court to a fair outcome of the dispute and helping the parties to a reasonable pre-trial settlement," the Allens lawyers said. 


Madden, meanwhile, argues: “Medical professionals are often called on to provide evidence, not simply of what they saw, heard or did, like most witnesses, but of their opinions on matters within their expertise.


“In the case in London, the court decided that an expert psychiatrist who changed her opinion on the mental state of a person injured in a car accident - even though it did not reflect her true view - could be sued for negligence.


Slater & Gordon argues the decision effectively overturns an immunity given to expert witnesses dating back to 1585.


“The Court found the injured person was entitled to bring a claim against the consultant psychiatrist for the loss flowing from the signing of a joint statement with another expert, without the exercise of reasonable care.” 


The UK Supreme Court decision is not directly binding on Australian courts. 


“However in my opinion, the reasoning of the UK Supreme Court is persuasive and we may see a similar shift in approach here,” Madden said.


“While it is highly unlikely for experts to fail to take reasonable care in the expert evidence process, following this ruling we may start to see expert witnesses retained under written contracts, with clauses that seek to limit their liability for negligence.”


As Allens' Quinlan and Howie said, however, the majority of the Supreme Court stressed that proving an expert's negligence will not be an easy process, and Lord Brown noted that successful claims against experts will be "highly exceptional"


Lord Brown urged the courts "to be alert to protect expert witnesses against specious claims by disappointed litigants".


Less alarmed than their Slater & Gordon counterparts, perhaps, the Allens lawyers argue it remains to be seen whether or not this decision will have a chilling effect on the willingness of experts to provide their services. 


"What is clear, however, is that expert witnesses, both in the UK and Australia, should ensure that they are protected from potential liability by adequate insurance arrangements and appropriate contractual provisions in their retainers."

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Allens, Slater & Gordon debate local impact of UK court decision
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...