find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Competition, Policy & Regulatory
Category: Other | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Work with a well regarded Partner · Sydney CBD
View details
Commercial Litigation Senior Associate
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Lawyers Weekly Australia Partner of the Year 2016, Insolvency
View details
MULTIPLEX Regional Legal Counsel (Vic) | 7 to 10 years + PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Career defining in-house role · Tier One international contractor
View details
Junior Lawyer - Personal Injury Law
Category: Personal Injury Law | Location: Parramatta & Western Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Highly specialized practice · Challenging role with great opportunities
View details
IR Advisor/Member Advocate
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: St Leonards NSW 2065
· Permanent (0.8-1.0 FTE) role in a developing team
View details
Human rights commission defends new laws against judge

Human rights commission defends new laws against judge

Concerns that a national Human Rights Act would fall foul of the Constitution can be confidently put aside, President of the Australian Human Rights Commission Cathy Branson QC said today.

CONCERNS that a national Human Rights Act would fall foul of the Constitution can be confidently put aside, president of the Australian Human Rights Commission Cathy Branson QC said today.

Branson said constitutional validity of a national Human Rights Act was questioned earlier this year by former High Court Judge Michael McHugh who expressed doubts that elements of the proposed model were constitutionally valid.

“To clear the air, the Australian Human Rights Commission recently held a roundtable, bringing together some of Australia’s leading constitutional and human rights lawyers, including Mr McHugh and former Chief Justice Sir Anthony Mason, to discuss the constitutional validity of a Human Rights Act,” she said.

“The roundtable reached unanimous agreement on a number of important issues, most importantly, that a Human Rights Act can be drafted in a way that is constitutionally valid.”

Branson said the principal concern had been that it might be unconstitutional for a court to issue a declaration of incompatibility, a common feature of human rights acts elsewhere. 

“The Australian Constitution prevents a court exercising federal jurisdiction, such as the High Court, from making an order that does not directly affect any person’s rights."

Branson said the roundtable agreed that this concern could be addressed by taking the courts out of the notification process. 

“Instead, an independent body such as the Australian Human Rights Commission could keep a watch on cases and notify the Parliament through the Attorney-General if a court were unable to interpret the legislation in a way that was compatible with the Human Rights Act,” she said. 

“This would ensure that Parliament was be notified of significant cases in which a court was not able to interpret legislation consistently with human rights. Of course, having been notified, Parliament would retain the final say about whether the law should be changed.”

Branson said that requiring courts to interpret laws consistently with human rights where possible and requiring the Parliament to give further consideration to laws which do not respect human rights would enhance the accountability of elected representatives and the transparency of our democratic processes.

“The time is right for Australia to join with other Western democracies in giving formal protection to human rights in Australia through a national Human Rights Act,” Branson said.

“I urge all who agree with me to set aside concerns about the Constitution and concentrate on sending the clear message to the National Consultation on Human Rights that we want Australia to be a country in which human rights matter.”

The Australian legal profession, meanwhile, today spoke out against inadequate laws protecting human rights. See the news here

The roundtable statement concerning the constitutional validity of an Australian Human Rights Act can be found here.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Human rights commission defends new laws against judge
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Human body, illegal organ trafficking, ALHR
Sep 22 2017
Australia poised to combat illegal organ harvesting: ALHR
The Australian Lawyers for Human Rights are calling for changes to the law so that organ trafficking...
Online service, barristers, BarristerSELECT, Stephen Foley
Sep 22 2017
New online service leverages barristers’ clerks to aid briefing
A new online tool has been launched to help NSW solicitors find the most suitable barristers for the...
NSW District Court judge, Tim Gartelmann SC, next appointment,
Sep 22 2017
Silk replaces outgoing NSW District Court judge
A barrister has been named as the next appointment to the NSW District Court, following the retireme...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...