find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
James Hardie poses new risks for general counsel

James Hardie poses new risks for general counsel

Murray Deakin and Sylvia Ng at Middletons offer an insight into the risks for general counsel arising out of the High Court's recent decision in the James Hardie case.

Murray Deakin and Sylvia Ng at Middletons offer an insight into the risks for general counsel arising out of the High Court's recent decision in the James Hardie case.

General counsel are exposed to new risks of prosecution by ASIC after the High Court dismissed an appeal by the former general counsel and company secretary of James Hardie. In the James Hardie decision, the High Court found that the former general counsel and company secretary was an "officer" under the Corporations Act and failed to discharge his duties as an officer of the company with the degree of care and due diligence that a reasonable person in his position would have exercised.

The High Court's decision highlights two key new risks under the Corporations Act for general counsel. Firstly, those who occupy the positions of company secretary and general counsel will be taken to be an "officer" under the Corporations Act, in respect of all their responsibilities, including their responsibilities as general counsel. The High Court held that it was not possible to divide the duties and responsibilities of the general counsel and company secretary, given the "single, composite description given to the job".

The Court could not find any evidence demonstrating or suggesting that the former general counsel and company secretary performed certain tasks in one "capacity" and other tasks in another. It was held that once general counsel is taken to be an officer by virtue of his or her role as company secretary, he or she will be an officer in respect of all responsibilities within the company "regardless of how or why those responsibilities came to be imposed on that officer". Accordingly, because of the qualifications, position of employment and responsibilities of the former general counsel and company secretary, his responsibilities were found to have extended to proffering advice on disclosure and any limitations on advice procured from external advisors.

Secondly, and more importantly for those who occupy the sole position of general counsel, if general counsel plays a large and active part in formulating important proposals for the board, he or she may also be taken to be an "officer" under the Corporations Act and liable to penalty in the event of any deficiency with those proposals.

In this case, the High Court held that the former general counsel of James Hardie should be taken to be an "officer" on the basis that he participated in making decisions of the requisite character, notwithstanding that he did not make the ultimate decisions, but because of the contribution he made to the making of the decisions, his level of seniority as an employee within the company, and that his role, according to the Court, went beyond proffering advice to the board.

As it is not uncommon to find general counsel conscientiously involved in preparing board papers and presentations to a board or CEO for consideration, general counsel should be aware that this type of work and the actual responsibilities they assume in a corporate environment may make them "officers".

As this case has shown, once taken to be an officer, general counsel is subject to a number of duties under the Corporations Act, and consequently is exposed to the risk of contravening the Act, which may result in prosecution, disqualification, liability to pay pecuniary penalties and legal costs, and damage to reputation.

Murray Deakin is a partner and Sylvia Ng a senior associate at Middletons.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

James Hardie poses new risks for general counsel
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...