find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
High Court in corporations power play

High Court in corporations power play

THE CONSTITUTIONAL implications of the High Court’s WorkChoices decision have divided legal commentators, as the states and unions reel from the Federal Government’s body blow via the weight of…

THE CONSTITUTIONAL implications of the High Court’s WorkChoices decision have divided legal commentators, as the states and unions reel from the Federal Government’s body blow via the weight of the corporations power.

Senior counsel Mordy Bromberg said the most surprising aspect of the decision was the wide view the Court gave of the corporations power under the Australian Constitution. He saw first hand the effect of the decision, having represented Victoria in the case.

“I think its significance transcends well beyond industrial relations,” he told Lawyers Weekly last week. “And I think it’s a watershed in terms of the interpretation of the constitution on the question of the balance of power between the states and the federal parliament.

“There was no attempt by the majority to try and confine the wide interpretation to this particular case, or to relations between corporations and their employees more generally,” he said.

“Instead, the court [said] quite clearly, that it sees the corporations power as a wide power applicable to a very wide range of circumstances.”

Prime Minister John Howard was quick to downplay the significance of the decision last week, stating that “it has underlined commonwealth power in relation to a number of economic issues, but it does not mean that our power in relation to things like health and education is any different”.

“I disagree whole heartedly,” Bromberg said. “As long as there is a corporation in the field … the corporations power extends to that field — it might be health, it might transport, it might be water — the identification of the field is irrelevant.”

Yet Douglas Graham, solicitor-general for Victoria between 1992 and 2002, appearing in some of the most important High Court constitutional law cases, including Victoria v The Commonwealth in 1996, believes the most recent decision is unsurprising.

“I don’t see the decision as representing a significant departure from the course of High Court authority in relation to the corporations power,” he said. “I think that’s been exaggerated in the course of the last few days.”

Nor does Graham “see any reason why the decision would enable the commonwealth to legislate in relation to hospitals or in relation to education, beyond what it does at the moment, mainly using its controlling financial powers”.

Yet according to Bromberg, the position of the states has been weakened, and he believes Justice Callanan’s description of future states as “debating societies” is an entirely likely outcome.

Andrew Lynch, senior lecturer at the University of New South Wales faculty of law, said that “given the pervasive position of corporations, this power now presents the Commonwealth with almost limitless potential to implement policies on a national level, and … erode further the autonomy of the states”.

“If you’re going to have states, then you shouldn’t have them in the current position that they’re in,” he said. “You should have some sensible allocation of powers and responsibilities between the states and the commonwealth. This seems to me the worst of both worlds.”

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

High Court in corporations power play
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...