find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
WorkChoices High Court result sends lawyers into spin

WorkChoices High Court result sends lawyers into spin

ANY DOUBT over the validity of the WorkChoices provisions was comprehensively settled in the High Court last week. Mordy Bromberg, a senior counsel who represented Victoria in the High Court…

ANY DOUBT over the validity of the WorkChoices provisions was comprehensively settled in the High Court last week.

Mordy Bromberg, a senior counsel who represented Victoria in the High Court case, believes the decision to be enormously significant.

“Having seen the reaction of some of the judges during the running of the case, I don’t think it’s surprising that the states were unsuccessful,” Bromberg said. “What I think is surprising is the extent of the victory for the Commonwealth.

“I think most people would have expected that WorkChoices would at least suffer some damage at the edges, rather than at its core,” Bromberg said. “And that didn’t happen.”

Bromberg expects employment lawyers will be kept busy interpreting “a very complex piece of legislation”. But he said the dominant position the Federal Government now holds should prevent further litigation on WorkChoices.

“Firstly, I think that unions may be reluctant to bring litigation in circumstances where they will have other more fundamental core needs to service in a hostile environment,” he said. “And secondly … in circumstances where the Coalition controls the Senate … any interpretation that a court might make, favourable to the union position, is liable to be the subject of an amendment to the legislation.”

Greg Robertson, partner at Harmers Workplace Lawyers, was equally surprised at the extent of the Federal Government’s victory, though the essence of the decision was to be expected.

“There seemed to be a lot of people who thought perhaps that the part on unions would be invalid, even those who thought the rest of it would survive,” he said.

“[But] for lawyers it is, in one sense, not an unexpected decision. It’s a typical lawyers’ decision — very legalistic in a lot ways. But that’s they way you read the Constitution these days.”

As the High Court expressly stated that it would not rule on what made up a constitutional corporation, “that leaves some areas still uncertain,” Robertson said. “Local government is one of those, [and] a number of fairly large charities, [in] that they have trading aspects to their nature.”

This means that difficulties still exist in dealing with large charities, where their trading components are very small in terms of the overall aspect of the trading, Robertson said.

David Ey, partner and head of Piper Alderman’s employment relations division, cited other areas of uncertainty.

“What is the true scope of the ‘operational reasons’ exclusion of unfair dismissal claims; how will the ‘prohibited content’ restrictions on workplace agreements be interpreted in specific cases; and how will the ‘reasonable additional hours’ rules be interpreted?” he asked. “We can expect a steady stream of case law for some time to come.

“Some interesting things to watch will be the extent to which the Australian Industrial Relations Commission will stay involved in dispute resolution; the potential development of common law remedies for dismissal where an unfair dismissal remedy is excluded; and the way the Office of Workplace Services will interpret and police the laws on things such as applying duress to make an Australian Workplace Agreement,” Ey said.

Ey expects there will “be even more ‘fine tuning’, as the government calls it, in future”, particularly given that some employees still sit outside the reach of the WorkChoices provisions.

“The decision doesn’t take the Federal Government any further towards creating a national industrial relations system,” Ey said.

“For the time being at least, we will continue to have state industrial systems, outside of Victoria, covering employers who fall outside of Work Choices, [such as those in] partnerships, sole traders and some state government employees.”

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

WorkChoices High Court result sends lawyers into spin
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...