find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Competition, Policy & Regulatory
Category: Other | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Work with a well regarded Partner · Sydney CBD
View details
Commercial Litigation Senior Associate
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Lawyers Weekly Australia Partner of the Year 2016, Insolvency
View details
MULTIPLEX Regional Legal Counsel (Vic) | 7 to 10 years + PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Career defining in-house role · Tier One international contractor
View details
Junior Lawyer - Personal Injury Law
Category: Personal Injury Law | Location: Parramatta & Western Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Highly specialized practice · Challenging role with great opportunities
View details
IR Advisor/Member Advocate
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: St Leonards NSW 2065
· Permanent (0.8-1.0 FTE) role in a developing team
View details
Letter to the Editor: In defense of effective billing

Letter to the Editor: In defense of effective billing

If firms did a better job at conveying and value, clients would not give a boot about time spent. John Chisholm writes.

I refer to the article headed “Time Billing Still Preferred by Firms”, appearing in the The New Lawyer edition 27 January, where Matt Parry, CEO of time capturing software provider Stratatel Sotflog, refers to a survey commissioned by his company among some legal professionals.

Whilst I am unable to comment on the survey itself, nor the percentages quoted by Mr Parry, it does not surprise me that the survey showed that “...the majority of firms reported clients are more focused on their legal spend, with 86 per cent saying that customers either questioned an invoice or requested more detailed timesheets for work done”.

I refer to his comments about a tighter economic environment, where a law firm is unable or unwilling to price its services up front (or at best only provide an estimate or range of its price), and therefore enters into an arrangement with its client only explaining its method of charging, that is to charge solely according to time in six minute increments. Of course some of those clients are going to increasingly question and challenge what the time was spent on and whether it was “justifiably” spent or otherwise.

Such questioning or requirement for more detail is hardly an example of a trusted lawyer/client relationship. Such firms might say they have this relationship with their clients but [they do not] if the relationship is primarily centred around time input rather than outcomes and value provided.

Mr Parry goes onto state that “there’s no doubt the day of the one-line invoice is well and truly over”. 

For firms and their clients buried in the mire of the billable hour, this may well be the case. But for an increasing number of firms and their clients who mutually agree on the deliverables, and the price to be paid for such deliverables at the beginning of a matter, the one line invoice will suffice and the firm and client can both move on and focus solely on the outcomes to be achieved.

If clients get an effective result, along with a fixed price before the work begins, they won’t care about time, apart from elapsed time. Do you get to see Ford's internal cost accounting before buying a car? If firms did a better job at conveying and communicating value, clients would not give a hoot about time spent.

“Accurately tracking and analysing time sheets and billable time..” is not a key indicator of profitability. 

Having clients who appreciate the value of the services you provide to them, pricing those services accordingly and being paid for those services is [a key indicator]. 

And here’s a hint to the readers of The New Lawyer: If you want to know what some lawyer in your office did with their time during the day - try asking them.

John Chisholm is the director of Chishom Consulting, which advises law firms. 

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Letter to the Editor: In defense of effective billing
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Sep 20 2017
Silk picked to monitor national security laws
Dr James Renwick SC has been appointed as Independent National Security Legislation Monitor after se...
Two businessman, growth
Sep 19 2017
Aus catching up on international arbitration front
Australia is starting to see a spike in international arbitration with this set to continue over the...
Sep 19 2017
Manson family killer suffered ‘miscarriage of justice’: former lawyer
A retired Australian barrister has published a book on the Manson Family murders of 1969 and called ...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...