find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Competition, Policy & Regulatory
Category: Other | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Work with a well regarded Partner · Sydney CBD
View details
Commercial Litigation Senior Associate
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Lawyers Weekly Australia Partner of the Year 2016, Insolvency
View details
MULTIPLEX Regional Legal Counsel (Vic) | 7 to 10 years + PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Career defining in-house role · Tier One international contractor
View details
Junior Lawyer - Personal Injury Law
Category: Personal Injury Law | Location: Parramatta & Western Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Highly specialized practice · Challenging role with great opportunities
View details
IR Advisor/Member Advocate
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: St Leonards NSW 2065
· Permanent (0.8-1.0 FTE) role in a developing team
View details
Too many terror laws spoil the brew

Too many terror laws spoil the brew

AUSTRALIA HAS an overabundance of anti-terror laws that may be doing more harm than good, a leading academic says.Speaking at the Brain Food lecture series presented by the University of New…

AUSTRALIA HAS an overabundance of anti-terror laws that may be doing more harm than good, a leading academic says.

Speaking at the Brain Food lecture series presented by the University of New South Wales (UNSW) Alumni Association, Professor George Williams said the 40 anti-terror laws that have been enacted since September 11, 2001 — roughly one law every seven weeks — are in urgent need of review.

Williams was quick to acknowledge that legislators were obliged, both from a duty to Australians and the international community at large, to bring unprecedented anti-terror laws into effect in a short period of time.

“They do have a tough job, and my starting point is that they need to engage in these sorts of areas,” he told Lawyers Weekly, explaining that now is the time to “look back, after a bit more than five years, and say ‘we did need new laws, but in some areas we’ve gone too far, and too fast’”.

“And I think the mark of a good lawmaker is to recognise that even if the law was needed at the time, it may need revision; with the benefit of hindsight it may need better protections,” Williams said.

Of the many laws he considers in need of repair, Williams holds those dealing with surveillance and telecommunications, sedition and the new detention powers of ASIO as some of the most pressing.

“You could also point to some quite stringent changes to the criminal justice system that I think rebalance that system in a way that is quite inconsistent with traditional principles of criminal responsibility,” he said.

“Many of these laws can be justified — they just can’t be justified as to how far they go. It’s a classic case of over-reach, in a lot of the laws, where you’d say … there’s something sensible behind them, but you’ve just gone too far.”

Control orders under the new laws may also be in need of review, although Williams declined to comment on the issue, with specific reference to Jack Thomas, as he has been briefed in the case to appear in the High Court later in the year.

The UNSW professor was at pains to stress that there are many commendable features of Australia’s anti-terror laws, including “that they establish a crime of terrorism, and that they make it clear that our law rejects these forms of political violence”.

We also have a definition for ‘terrorism’ that is “better than those in many other nations, including the US and the UK, because at least it does include exceptions for things like advocacy and protest,” he said.

But overshadowing all of these laws is the question of Australia’s absent bill of rights, Williams said, which would clearly set down the right to free speech and association, among other values and principles.

Should the anti-terror laws continue to exist as they do, they may even form part of the problem, Williams said.

“If the law scares people, if people start becoming fearful of their own government, people might be less likely to come forward to the police with good intelligence or information about people in their community, or a possible terrorist attack,” he said.

“It may even be in some cases that people feel so angry or ostracised or alienated that they are more likely to take extreme action.”

The time has come for Attorney-General Philip Ruddock to take charge of the situation, he said.

“Clearly [Ruddock] has a key role to play in this — it’s his primary responsibility. All the Attorney needs to do … is to implement changes that have been recognised by independent and expert bodies, and that would be a good start.”

Williams is the Anthony Mason professor and director of the Gilbert & Tobin Centre of Public Law at the faculty of law, UNSW.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Too many terror laws spoil the brew
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Human body, illegal organ trafficking, ALHR
Sep 22 2017
Australia poised to combat illegal organ harvesting: ALHR
The Australian Lawyers for Human Rights are calling for changes to the law so that organ trafficking...
Online service, barristers, BarristerSELECT, Stephen Foley
Sep 22 2017
New online service leverages barristers’ clerks to aid briefing
A new online tool has been launched to help NSW solicitors find the most suitable barristers for the...
NSW District Court judge, Tim Gartelmann SC, next appointment,
Sep 22 2017
Silk replaces outgoing NSW District Court judge
A barrister has been named as the next appointment to the NSW District Court, following the retireme...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...