find the latest legal job
Corporate/Commercial Lawyers (2-5 years PAE)
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Specialist commercial law firm · Long-term career progression
View details
Graduate Lawyer / Up to 1.5 yr PAE Lawyer
Category: Personal Injury Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Mentoring Opportunity in Regional QLD · Personal Injury Law
View details
Corporate and Commercial Partner
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Full time · Join a leading Adelaide commercial law firm
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Sydney NSW
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
Exclusive: Maddocks partners at odds over merger

Exclusive: Maddocks partners at odds over merger

The partnership at Maddocks was split over whether the firm should merge with Pinsent Masons.

Yesterday (3 December) Lawyers Weekly exclusively broke the story that global law firm Pinsent Masons is coming to Australia, and that it had poached Maddocks CEO David Rennick.

Pinsent Masons and Maddocks were in earnest discussions over a possible merger.

It is Lawyers Weekly’s understanding that a meeting involving Maddocks partners, scheduled for mid-December, was to float the idea of the merger, with that meeting possibly including a vote on a merger.

However, it became clear that the requisite overwhelming majority support for a merger with Pinsent Masons did not exist within the partnership at Maddocks and the mooted merger fell through.

It is understood that support for the merger among the ranks of the 69 partners at Maddocks was around 50 per cent at best.

When considering a merger, most law firms would require at least a 75 per cent partnership approval on both sides for any link-up to go ahead.

Only speaking to Lawyers Weekly

Maddocks chair Stan Kondilios (pictured) agreed to exclusively answer questions from Lawyers Weekly this afternoon.

He was cagey about the level of support for or against a possible merger with Pinsent Masons, but did not rule out the three-office Australian firm looking to link up with a global law firm in the future.

“The market continues to change, and we’re committed to being agile in our approach,” said Kondilios. “Our focus rests with remaining close to our valued clients in delivering premium legal services in government, infrastructure and services.”

Kondilios refused to reveal whether Maddocks was speaking to other firms about a possible merger at present.

Lawyers Weekly approached Pinsent Masons for comment.

In a statement, the firm confirmed Rennick had agreed to join the firm as a consultant to look at launching in Australia.

“We have made excellent progress towards achieving our vision of becoming a law firm of truly international reach, and as part of that program of growth are giving careful consideration to how we can capitalise on opportunities in the Australian market,” said the firm.

Pinsent Masons was in the top 15 UK law firms by revenue in 2012-13.

Lawyers Weekly understands that despite the breakdown of discussions with Maddocks, Pinsent Masons remains committed to launching in Australia in the first half of next year.

Rennick is set to vacate the CEO’s chair at Maddocks on Christmas Eve and leave the firm’s partnership by the end of February.

Lawyers Weekly also understands that once Pinsent Masons formally launches in Australia, Rennick is likely to remain at the firm as a senior partner.

Lawyers Weekly further understands that while Rennick is the only partner from Maddocks committed to joining Pinsent Masons at present, other equity partners at the firm are considering their options with rival firms.

Kondilios said the firm remains committed to its core business areas of infrastructure and financial services, with the firm achieving double-digit growth in key practice areas.

The firm has around 18 per cent of its staff working flexibly and has been an EOWA employer of choice since 2004.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Exclusive: Maddocks partners at odds over merger
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Scales of Justice
Dec 15 2017
Timing ‘critical’ in unusual contempt of court ruling
A recent case could have interesting implications for contempt of court rulings, according to a Ferr...
Dec 14 2017
International arbitration and business culture
Promoted by Maxwell Chambers. This article discusses the impact of international arbitration on t...
Papua New Guinea flag
Dec 14 2017
World-first mining case launched in PNG
Citizens of Papua New Guinea have launched landmark legal proceedings against the country’s govern...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...