find the latest legal job
Corporate/Commercial Lawyers (2-5 years PAE)
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Specialist commercial law firm · Long-term career progression
View details
Graduate Lawyer / Up to 1.5 yr PAE Lawyer
Category: Personal Injury Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Mentoring Opportunity in Regional QLD · Personal Injury Law
View details
Corporate and Commercial Partner
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Full time · Join a leading Adelaide commercial law firm
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Sydney NSW
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
Daubney wrong on judicial appointment reform

Daubney wrong on judicial appointment reform

JUNE McPHIE, president of the Law Society of New South Wales, has strongly disagreed with supporters of judicial appointment reform in Queensland.“The Law Society is totally against the…

JUNE McPHIE, president of the Law Society of New South Wales, has strongly disagreed with supporters of judicial appointment reform in Queensland.

“The Law Society is totally against the establishment of an official body or committee for the selection of judges,” McPhie said in a statement to Lawyers Weekly.

This came in response to the new president of the Queensland Bar Association, Martin Daubney’s comments last week that the Bar’s chief aim was to reform the judicial appointment process.

He said in The Australian that it was time to consider numerous options, with priority given to a commission of judicial review, for “the issue is now squarely in the public arena and we think it responsible to advance possible solutions”.

The president of the Queensland Law Society, Rob Davis, supported the call for a commission, claiming that a panel of legal representatives of barristers, solicitors, the chief justice, head of the Court of Appeal and the head of the District Court was essential for the nomination of suitable candidates for appointment, as reported in the Courier Mail.

Yet McPhie believed that a commission of the sort proposed in Queensland might act as a deterrent for those wishing to advance to the judiciary.

“Many eminently suitable candidates would be reluctant to go through a public process of selection,” she said.

Daubney replaced outgoing president Peter Lyons on 19 July, following his resignation after the furore caused by the 7 July appointment of his wife, Ann Lyons to the Supreme Court of Queensland.

Ann Lyons is only the third former solicitor in Queensland to be appointed to the Supreme Court who was not first a member of the Bar.

Yet a spokesperson said that the NSW Law Society has nothing against solicitors being appointed to the bench, so long as they are suitably qualified.

According to McPhie, “the fundamental criterion for selection must be merit — qualities which constitute merit include legal skills, experience and personal attributes. No other consideration should be allowed to interfere with this paramount criterion if the Australian judiciary is to continue to maintain its eminence and independence”.

Daubney, a staunch critic of Ann Lyons’ elevation to the Supreme Court, said that it was “appropriate for the Bar to still be the primary resource when seeking appointments to the bench”.

Daubney had also expressed concern over the power of the executive government to appoint candidates to the judiciary in the absence of any real accountability.

This followed a heated exchange with Queensland Attorney-General Linda Lavarch over her apparent lack of consultation with the Bar about the appointment of Ann Lyons.

Lavarch went some way to appeasing the situation with a promise to engage in a “meaningful consultation with the Bar in relation to future judicial appointments”.

The Attorney-General admitted that the Queensland Bar Association and Law Society’s “perspective on possible appointments will add to the robust nature of the process”.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Daubney wrong on judicial appointment reform
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Jackie Rhodes
Dec 12 2017
Report sheds light on LGBTQI inclusion in law firms
A recent report has revealed the varying perceptions on LGBTQI diversity and inclusion in the Austra...
Women in business
Dec 12 2017
Annabel Crabb headlines Women in Business Forum
Political journalist Annabel Crabb has appeared at the Coleman Greig Lawyers Women in Business Forum...
Dec 11 2017
Warm welcome for new district court judges
Three practitioners who were appointed as district court judges in WA have been congratulated by ...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...