find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Profession welcomes mobility in ACT

Profession welcomes mobility in ACT

THE STANDARDISATION that will come with national legal profession legislation will benefit the entire profession, according to ACT Law Society president Greg Walker. But a significant bonus will…

THE STANDARDISATION that will come with national legal profession legislation will benefit the entire profession, according to ACT Law Society president Greg Walker. But a significant bonus will be for large law firms, which will finally have access to the option of incorporation.

The tabling in the ACT Legislative Assembly of the Legal Profession Bill 2006 last week, with the aim of harmonising regulation of the ACT legal profession with other Australian jurisdictions, will see lawyers around Australia able to work between the various states and territories.

The changes promote mobility at a time when that is appropriate for many law firms across Australia, Walker said.

“One of the main benefits of having legislation throughout Australia, which is almost uniform with respect to the legal profession, is that it makes it easier for a lawyer to practise in a number of different jurisdictions,” he said.

“The large national firms that operate in all jurisdictions, some of which permit incorporation and some which don’t, are a bit hamstrung as a result of the inconsistencies between the states with respect to the regulation of the profession.”

Many national law firms cannot incorporate because they operate across state lines. “So you have to operate as a partnership even though there might be an advantage for some of the large firms in getting incorporated,” Walker said.

“Certainly there will be some significant benefits for the large firms … It will permit lawyers to be more mobile, in a way that is consistent across the country.”

The rules governing regulation of the legal profession will be much closer to a single model than they have been previously, Walker said. While some argue the legal profession is already the most regulated profession in Australia, the model law will be even more stringent, he added.

“It involves a somewhat more regulated environment,” he said. “Some would say [the legal profession] needs no more regulation, and certainly there are some aspects of the model law that possibly go overboard in that regard. But perhaps it is the price you pay for having the greater degree of mobility that arises out of uniform legislation.”

The Bill has been introduced into the ACT Legislative Assembly in time for it to come into effect on 1 July this year. New provisions of the Bill include the compulsory licensing of barristers and a new disciplinary tribunal completely independent of the profession. The Bill would also bring in a more prescriptive fees disclosure system designed to protect clients.

One of the biggest complaints that lawyers face from clients concerns time costing, Walker said. “The situation where the lawyer takes instructions and works out what is needed, and then goes off and does it without giving the clients advice about the rates to be charged [causes complaints]. There are all sorts of things that can get thrown in [the Bill],” he said.

“When you are expecting a certain amount to pay, and then you get a bill based on time costing, you might think that you haven’t had any say in the negotiation of the actual price. So it is designed to try and remedy some of those problems.”

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Profession welcomes mobility in ACT
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...