find the latest legal job
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Insurance Lawyer (1 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Great Career Opportunity ·
View details
Insurance and Health Lawyer (1-4 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· New position to support Growth ·
View details
Courts open the door to legal professional privilege in-house

Courts open the door to legal professional privilege in-house

Sylvia Fernandez

Recent judgements have put in-house counsel and lawyers in private practice on an even footing by making it easier for their legal advice to attract privilege, a Holding Redlich partner has said.   

Sylvia Fernandez (pictured) spoke at the Australian Corporate Lawyers Association’s (ACLA’s) Corporate Counsel Day on March 4 on the 2013 Federal Court case involving Archer Capital and Sage.

“The decision in my view is positive news because it suggests a move away from this idea that ‘employed lawyers’ have a special handicap in that they have to show that they are independent,” she said.

‘Employed lawyers’ previously had to prove their independence in order for their legal advice to attract privilege. This made it more difficult for in-house lawyers in government departments and companies to protect the confidentiality of communications with their client.

“The root of the court’s thinking seemed to be that because of the employment relationship, an ‘employed lawyer’ is not free of personal loyalties, duties or interests,” said Ms Fernandez.

However, following the recent comments by Justice Michael Wigney in the Archer Capital case, in-house lawyers will now be accepted as independent without evidentiary burdens just as lawyers in private practice are considered independent.

In the Archer Capital case, it was alleged that Sage’s company secretary and group legal director, Michael Robinson, lacked the independence necessary to found a claim of legal professional privilege because he worked in-house with his client.

Justice Wigney rejected this claim, indicating that legal professional privilege will attach to confidential communications from an employed solicitor working in a “professional capacity in relation to a professional matter that arises from the relationship of lawyer and client”.

“Justice Whitney also thought it was of no consequence to the question of independence that [Mr Robinson] was not admitted in Australia and didn’t have a practising certificate in Australia,” noted Ms Fernandez.

A further problem is that working in-house in dual roles can blur the lines between legal and commercial duties, making it unclear which communications are protected by lawyer-client privilege and which are not.

Ms Fernandez said this has become a significant issue, quoting the 2012 ACLA in-house counsel report, which found that 80 per cent of the heads of legal functions in-house had formal responsibility for at least one additional function, the most common being compliance (53 per cent), the role of company secretary (48 per cent) and governance (47 per cent).

Untangling legal from non-legal advice can be a challenge for in-house counsel as well as the courts.

Fortunately, the concept of legal advice is no longer narrowly focused and “now extends to professional advice to what a party should prudently or sensibly do in a particular relevant legal context”, added Ms Fernandez.

Ms Fernandez said in-house lawyers should be very careful about stamping documents so they are clearly shown to be privileged legal advice.

She advised against circulating legal advice widely by email inside or outside organisations and said in-house counsel must not disclose even the gist of the legal advice as this may compromise its privileged status.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Courts open the door to legal professional privilege in-house
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Quentin Bryce
DV has worsened in a generation: Quentin Bryce
Former governor-general of Australia Dame Quentin Bryce AD CVO has spoken of her deep distress about...
Academics entertain the idea of law without lawyers
Researchers from Queensland will explore some of the most disruptive trends tipped to transform the ...
Please, Continue (Hamlet), Melbourne Festival
Oct 16 2017
Hamlet suffers slings and arrows of top Victorian barristers
Victorian judges and barristers have performed the unique play Please, Continue (Hamlet) at the Melb...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...