find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Slater & Gordon takes telco on in class action

Slater & Gordon takes telco on in class action

LAW FIRM Slater & Gordon filed the first class action against Australia’s largest telco Telstra late last week on behalf of shareholders who allege the company failed to disclose its true…

LAW FIRM Slater & Gordon filed the first class action against Australia’s largest telco Telstra late last week on behalf of shareholders who allege the company failed to disclose its true financial position.

The plaintiff law firm commenced the action against Telstra in the Federal Court of Australia for shareholders who claim they paid inflated prices for the company’s shares because it hid important financial information about its future earnings and past investments to the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX).

Slater & Gordon’s Joanne Rees said investors had contacted the law firm angry that the telco had given information to the federal government but hadn’t released it to the market. “The law is very clear, these details should have been released as soon as Telstra became aware of them,” said Rees.

“We had mum and dad investors who had invested superannuation funds on the basis that they could trust what Telstra was saying about its performance,” Rees told Lawyers Weekly.

Despite there being no public notification, about 50 shareholders have contacted the law firm, angry at Telstra’s “behaviour”, said the firm. It said last week that when the Court defines the terms of the class, any investor who purchase shares between the relevant dates is able to join the case, adding that this could be several thousand.

The firm said that in the statement of claim, it is alleged that on 11 August last year the company gave a private briefing to senior federal ministers in which it forecast a drop in future earnings. As well, it revealed a $3 billion underspend on operating and capital expenditure in the previous three to five years.

This information was not revealed to the market until 7 September when Telstra released a copy of the government briefing to the ASX. The law firm noted that the company’s inaction in revealing the information to the market was in breach of the ASX Listing Rules and the Corporations Act 2001.

“We know Telstra held onto the information for about a month, between telling the government in August and the Stock Exchange in September,” said Rees from Slater & Gordon.

“How long before August they actually knew about the changes in market disclosed information we are yet to discover,” she said. “Had Telstra disclosed this information immediately it is likely the share price would have fallen significantly.”

Investors now want to claim compensation for the difference between the price they paid and the value of the shares if the market had known all the details, Rees added.

This is not the first significant class action case Slater & Gordon has taken in recent years. Principal actions have included fighting for compensation for the James Hardie asbestos victims, as well as legal proceedings on behalf of McCabe against British American Tobacco. As well, said Rees, “there was the helping the hundreds of businesses that suffered financial loss following the contamination of Sydney’s water in 1998”.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Slater & Gordon takes telco on in class action
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...