find the latest legal job
Part Time Risk & Compliance Officer
Category: Other | Location: Brisbane QLD 4000
· Brisbane City · Flexible Part Time Hours
View details
Infrastructure Lawyer/SA
Category: Construction Law | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Global elite law firm · Dedicated Infrastructure team
View details
Property Lawyer
Category: Property Law | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· 12 Month Contract · Diverse Work
View details
Family Lawyer
Category: Family Law | Location: Eastern Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Boutique Firm · Great Reputation
View details
Infrastructure Lawyers
Category: Construction Law | Location: All Perth WA
· We'd be particularly interested to hear from you if you were a lawyer who knows your way around the infrastructure and energy sectors.
View details
Small state lawyers seek share of government pie

Small state lawyers seek share of government pie


As South Australia moves to increase the number of government contracts going to local firms, the Law Society of Tasmania has called for similar action.

State Treasurer Tom Koutsantonis announced last week that the government planned to bolster the minimum participation of South Australian companies, including law firms, in state projects.

As of next month, state government tender evaluations will have to give a minimum weighting of 10 per cent to “local jobs”, or 15 per cent for contracts worth more than $220,000.

For specific projects, including the $93 million Northern Adelaide infrastructure project, the weighting for local companies could be set as high as 20 per cent.

The Law Society of South Australia welcomed the news, citing the hope that more South Australian firms would be brought onto government projects.

“South Australian law firms have the expertise to undertake complex commercial legal work,” it said in a statement.

“For South Australia to be able to boast of having the brightest and best talent, local firms should be entrusted to take on the work arising out of major government projects.”

In particular, the Law Society of South Australia cited a “sluggish economy” and “high unemployment” as key reasons for favouring local firms.

According to Law Society of Tasmania president Matthew Verney, protection for local lawyers is badly needed in Tasmania as well.

While Mr Verney said the government’s policy is to employ local firms where possible, he cited two instances in the past 12 months of high-profile state government and Hobart City Council work going to mainland firms.

In November 2014, the state government brought in Melbourne-based lawyers from Herbert Smith Freehills to act on a pay dispute with public sector unions at the Industrial Commission.

In April of this year, the Hobart City Council hired a Sydney-based barrister to act on a property development dispute.

"It seems to me that the governments, both local and state, pay lip service to prioritising local firms,” Mr Verney said. “But when they really have the opportunity to put their money where their mouth is, I don't think they necessarily follow through.”

While he denied being “protectionist”, he suggested the government needed to take “actual action on the part of governments, state and local, in implementing the policy they say they already have”.

He suggested a similar approach to what was introduced in South Australia could be a “good idea” in Tasmania.

In the Northern Territory, Law Society president Tass Liveris suggested cases where the clients are based in the Territory, and involve causes of action arising in the Territory, should involve the local legal profession.

"The society acknowledges that there may be occasions where specialist expertise is required and cannot be provided by the local profession, but in the main the society considers that consumers benefit by having the widest availability of legal service providers with expertise in Northern Territory law and procedure," he said.

"It is especially important to ensure that the law practices outside of the greater Darwin area are not effectively precluded from being awarded government work as a result of government brief-out policy.”

While the Law Society declared support for the government's use of a list system for sourcing firms, Mr Liveris said he was "supportive of regular reviews of the process and any changes that might enhance it".

Like this story? Subscribe to our free newsletter and receive Lawyers Weekly every day straight to your inbox.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Small state lawyers seek share of government pie
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Nov 17 2017
It's time for politicians to commit to eradicating domestic violence
The national shame of domestic violence cannot be left unaddressed, writes Christine Smyth. ...
Nov 16 2017
From lawyer in law firm to senior governance professional
Promoted by Governance Institute of Australia As a law graduate, Kate Griffiths never imagined...
marriage equality
Nov 16 2017
Legislation the next hurdle for marriage equality
Lawyers have underscored the importance of ensuring same-sex marriage legislation does not limit ant...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...