find the latest legal job
Part Time Risk & Compliance Officer
Category: Other | Location: Brisbane QLD 4000
· Brisbane City · Flexible Part Time Hours
View details
Infrastructure Lawyer/SA
Category: Construction Law | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Global elite law firm · Dedicated Infrastructure team
View details
Property Lawyer
Category: Property Law | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· 12 Month Contract · Diverse Work
View details
Family Lawyer
Category: Family Law | Location: Eastern Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Boutique Firm · Great Reputation
View details
Infrastructure Lawyers
Category: Construction Law | Location: All Perth WA
· We'd be particularly interested to hear from you if you were a lawyer who knows your way around the infrastructure and energy sectors.
View details
Corporations Act ‘stifles’ healthy risk taking: Justice Robson

Corporations Act ‘stifles’ healthy risk taking: Justice Robson


Regulators have “lost sight” of the fundamental purpose of the Corporations Act, which is to encourage responsible risk taking by company directors, according to Justice Ross Robson.

Speaking on a panel at the 2015 Governance Institute of Australia National Conference in Melbourne on 1 December, Justice Robson of the Supreme Court of Victoria said over-regulation was stymieing business.

“In passing regulations we should not be stifling the taking of risk,” he said. “It is the duty of directors to take calculated risks [and] I think that should be recognised fully in the Corporations Act.”

According to Justice Robson, the initial reason for the Corporations Act was to enable people to undertake a risky business venture without putting their own private wealth at risk. This is captured in the idea of limited liability, he said.

He continued: “Secondly, the Corporations Act also facilitated the raising of capital whereby shareholders as well could participate in the venture and, again, the only money at risk was the investment they make in the shares.”

While regulators should penalise “reckless” behaviour, company directors are “under a responsibility to take calculated risks” and would be “failing in their duty” if they simply invested in government bonds, said Justice Robson.

“One of the main jobs of a commercial judge is to oil the wheels of commerce,” he added.

Another flaw in the Act is the disincentives for companies to trade on after becoming insolvent, he continued.

“The problem with our corporations law at the moment is that if there is some risk of insolvency, then the directors really just have to give up and hand it over to the administrators, which is really the death knell of the company.

“There should be some encouragement for directors to be able to take steps to try and save the company.”

Fitting into the business cycle

One of the greatest challenges in commercial cases is wrapping up court proceedings in a timely manner, according to judges on the Governance Conference panel.

“Based on my recent experience as barrister, what I found was what clients in the business community really wanted from the court system was timeliness,” said Justice Mark Moshinsky of the Federal Court.

“Because the business community generally works on a one-year cycle, if the court system takes longer than that there is not as much interest in the outcome because it’s all taking too long.”

Justice Jennifer Davies, a judge at the Federal Court of Australia, said judges rely “very heavily” on legal practitioners in bringing about a resolution to a case in an “efficient and expedient way”.

“One of the factors in many [cases involving] the Corporations Act is that there is a degree of urgency,” she said.

“The commercial world can't wait for a finely polished judgement from the court and so that there is a need for the legal counsel to provide to the judge all the judge requires in order to make an informed and cognoscente [decision] on the case as presented.”

Justice Davis said it was crucial that in-house counsel, general counsel and external lawyers work together in presenting a clear case.

“Nobody knows the inner workings of the company better than those who are inside the company,” she said.  

“In-house counsel have a very valuable role. [They] should be able to identify where to obtain the relevant evidence, where to start, who should be approached, who are the appropriate witnesses.”

Poor communication between all legal counsel is a major pitfall in complex commercial litigation, she continued.

“In my experience as a judge, when you have the three working in harmony with each other, it is a sheer delight watching a case fall into place; but if you are not working in harmony with each other, it can be disastrous.”

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Corporations Act ‘stifles’ healthy risk taking: Justice Robson
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Nov 17 2017
It's time for politicians to commit to eradicating domestic violence
The national shame of domestic violence cannot be left unaddressed, writes Christine Smyth. ...
Nov 16 2017
From lawyer in law firm to senior governance professional
Promoted by Governance Institute of Australia As a law graduate, Kate Griffiths never imagined...
marriage equality
Nov 16 2017
Legislation the next hurdle for marriage equality
Lawyers have underscored the importance of ensuring same-sex marriage legislation does not limit ant...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...