find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Corporate Lawyer (3-5 years PQE)
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· National firm acting for domestic and multinational clients
View details
Lawyer – CTP Insurance (2-3 years)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Well-regarded team offering mentoring and career development
View details
Australia behind on uptake of litigation technology

Australia behind on uptake of litigation technology


Overseas legal markets have embraced technological advances in dispute resolution but Australian firms have been slow off the mark, according to industry leaders. 

Speaking with Lawyers Weekly, Martin Flavell (pictured), eDiscovery manager at Law In Order, said the latest dispute resolution technology has not been readily adopted by Australian law firms. 

“I think we are probably a number of years behind the US in terms of technology,” he said.  

While eDiscovery has been around for at least a decade in Australia, law firms have shied away from newer technologies emerging in the US, such as predictive coding.

Predictive coding, or technology assisted review, combines human review with computer algorithms to select relevant documents in a case.

Instead of paralegals sifting through millions of documents, a team can select a number of highly relevant files and then run the remaining documents through the predictive coding software.

The software examines the phrases and words used in the subset of documents selected by the team to identify other relevant documents, reducing the manual tasks and, thus costs, involved in discovery.  

“You run the program overnight and it's done, rather than spend weeks with paralegals flicking through documents,” explained Robert Johnston, a partner at Johnson Winter & Slattery.

“It is good because it reduces the most significant cost part of litigation.”

Predictive coding was unheard of only three years ago but is is widely used in the US, according to Mr Flavell.

There was initially some resistance to the new method, but studies, such as the 2012 RAND report, have shown that predictive coding is just as accurate, if not more, than human review.

“[It] was quite a controversial thing to do maybe three years ago but now it's accepted,” said Mr Flavell.

“[Australian lawyers] see using that sort of technology as a risk,” he continued. “It is not really something that is happening at the moment in the Australian market.”

Mr Flavell said one of the reasons the uptake of new technologies has been slow is that lawyers are more comfortable working with paper.

Another reason is that Australian firms are not under the same pressures from clients to become cost-efficient as their American counterparts, according to Mr Flavell.

“My own theory on this is that the economic climate in Australia was never hit as harshly as Europe and the US during the GFC,” he said.

“Corporations and clients were very focused on saving every single penny where they could and I think we just haven't seen that in Australia.”

However, the sheer volume of documents that dispute resolution lawyers are faced with is making technological approaches necessary, according to Gilbert + Tobin partner Crispian Lynch.

“What you used to get was a client would go through their drawers and give you a box of relevant documents,” he said.

“Now you get a thumb drive with two million emails on it. And the client hasn't got the time to go through all of those, so it is up to the lawyer.”

While predictive coding is some way off in Australia, eDiscovery is increasingly being used by Australian firms. “There's definitely an established market,” Mr Flavell said.

The extent to which eDiscovery can cull documents varies from case to case, but the electronic removal of duplicates alone can reduce the document volume by between 25 and 75 per cent, according to Mr Flavell.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Australia behind on uptake of litigation technology
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Aug 23 2017
NT Law Society sounds alarm on mandatory sentencing
The Law Society Northern Territory has issued a warning over mandatory sentencing, saying it hasn’...
Aug 22 2017
Professionals unite in support of marriage equality
The presidents of representative bodies for solicitors, barristers and doctors in NSW have come toge...
Aug 21 2017
Is your firm on the right track for gig economy gains?
Promoted by Crowd & Co. The way we do business, where we work, how we engage with workers, ev...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...