find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
NSW Chief Justice highlights threat to professional privilege

NSW Chief Justice highlights threat to professional privilege

Tom Bathurst

Lawyers must be aware of the extent to which rights to legal professional privilege are being eroded by state law, Chief Justice of NSW Tom Bathurst has urged.

Speaking at the NSW Law Society Opening of Law Term dinner, Chief Justice Bathurst of the NSW Supreme Court revealed the findings of his review of state legislation.

In the course of his research, he found 162 provisions that abrogate the right to legal professional privilege.

Of these, 70 per cent create an obligation to provide information subject to a “reasonable” or “lawful” excuse.

A further 36 provisions create a strict obligation with no excuse or exception, and 13 specifically remove the entitlement to privilege or prevent it from applying.

Chief Justice Bathurst argued that lawyers need to appreciate the number of exceptions to legal rights being created, including to professional privilege, but also to the presumption of innocence and against self-incrimination.

In his view, these rights “are fundamental to the rule of law as we understand it and… partly inform our identity as legal professionals”.

If Parliament were to pass a law and remove these rights, “there would be an absolute outcry”, he said.

“It is important, therefore, that we, as lawyers, appreciate the extent of any encroachment on these rights.”

Chief Justice Bathurst acknowledged lawyers may disagree on whether each exception is justifiable, but he urged the profession as a whole to take note of the information and consider the issue in-depth.

“If we don’t do that, we may end up in a position where, without protest, those rights are so substantially diminished that the underpinning of the basis on which we conduct our profession is itself substantially impaired,” he said.

As an example of an encroachment, he pointed to s75V of the Crimes Act which, in certain circumstances, allows a police officer to prevent a person from communicating with their lawyer in private if there is a danger of evidence being destroyed.

Chief Justice Bathurst questioned the rationale for this provision, asking whether it implied a lawyer would be facilitating the destruction of evidence and how this could be prevented by limiting private communication.

Another example is section 22 of the Crime Commission Act, where the Commission can refuse to grant a person access to a lawyer if it believes the legal practitioner may prejudice its investigation.

Again, the Chief Justice pointed to ambiguity within the statute, particularly the question of whether “sound and solid legal advice” could be taken as prejudicing an investigation by defeating the Commission’s arguments.

Other legal rights are also subject to numerous exceptions, including 183 provisions which jeopardise the privilege against self-incrimination and 52 that encroach on the presumption of innocence.

Overall, the Chief Justice concluded that 397 legislative encroachments could be found in NSW law, although he described this as a “conservative” finding based on strict criteria.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

NSW Chief Justice highlights threat to professional privilege
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...