find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Law Council applauds Spigelman on tort speech

Law Council applauds Spigelman on tort speech

CHIEF JUSTICE of New South Wales, James Spigelman, is on the right track in his comments that the tide of tort reform changes must be turned back for the benefit of injured Australians,…

CHIEF JUSTICE of New South Wales, James Spigelman, is on the right track in his comments that the tide of tort reform changes must be turned back for the benefit of injured Australians, according to the peak body representing the Australian legal profession.

In an address to the 14th Commonwealth Law Conference in London entitled ‘Negligence: Is recovery for personal injury too generous?’, Chief Justice Spigelman said “the changes in NSW go well beyond anything that was ever recommended”.

“Those changes occurred without a full appreciation of the extent to which judicial attitudes had already changed and were changing. A number of persons, including myself, have indicated that in various respects the statutory changes have gone too far,” he said.

Law Council of Australia president John North said the Chief Justice’s comments refute claims made by Andrew Robb MP about compliant courts awarding unjustified levels of damages. “Changes in NSW and other jurisdictions have done nothing more than shift the burden of treating the injured from insurance companies to the taxpayer,” North said.

The Law Council reflected that in the 2002 “insurance crisis”, state governments legislated to curb rising premiums, which it said insurance companies claimed were the result of a “litigation explosion”. The Chief Justice was correct in refuting this misconception, said the Law Council’s North, and in pointing instead to the insurance industry’s own poor management, September 11 and the unusual number of natural disasters.

Spigelman said in his speech that there is “an active debate in Australia as to whether or not the statutory changes have gone too far”. This debate has been “fuelled by the modest reduction in premiums that has occurred to date, in contrast with the considerable increase in insurance company profits and their escalating share prices”.

“There is now a flow of judgments interpreting the new legislation which include critical comment by judges about the anomalies and the injustices arising from the application of the statutes,” Chief Justice Spigelman said.

Spigelman said many legal professionals have been concerned about the impact of the changes on injured Australians. “Legal practitioners and their representative organisations have emphasised that many people with serious injuries are no longer able to receive any or adequate compensation. Insurance companies and their organisations have responded by highlighting the self-interest that some legal practitioners have in these observations. There is a distinct element of pots calling kettles black and vice versa in all of this,” he said.

“In New South Wales a parliamentary committee is conducting an inquiry into the changes to personal injury compensation law both with respect to the general tort law reform and also the earlier changes to workers compensation and third party motor accident schemes. The changes in New South Wales went well beyond what has occurred in other States. That included significant changes that have no implication for insurance premiums paid by individual organisations or companies,” Spigelman said.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Law Council applauds Spigelman on tort speech
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...