find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Terror measures anger profession

Terror measures anger profession

THE FEDERAL Government’s proposed anti-terrorism measures, announced last week, are stoking anger and frustration among the legal profession. The Law Council of Australia (LCA) last week…

THE FEDERAL Government’s proposed anti-terrorism measures, announced last week, are stoking anger and frustration among the legal profession.

The Law Council of Australia (LCA) last week condemned the Government’s raft of new counter-terrorism proposals, arguing they will infringe on the rights and freedoms of Australians. It warned the states and territories against “rubber stamping” any new legislation until the potential effect can be assessed.

“We support proper measures that protect the community from terrorist acts. However, we’re very concerned that individuals’ rights will be further constrained by this proposed legislation,” Law Council president John North said.

Terror suspects could be electronically tagged for a year or held without charge for up to two weeks, the Law Council said. As well, police and spy agencies would be given more scope to investigate threats, it claimed.

The Law Institute of Victoria (LIV) last week joined the fray, warning that it will urge the Victorian Government to consider “very carefully” the loss of freedoms and rights arising from the proposals.

“Aspects of these laws, which expand on ASIO’s already extensive powers, offend all notions of basic civil liberties. They also have the potential to be enforced in a discriminatory way against racial and religious minorities who provide easy targets for random police searches and investigations,” said LIV president John Cain.

“While the possibility of a terrorist attack can’t be ruled our, there is no justification for the introduction of such extreme measures. There is certainly no evidence that the attacks in London would have been prevented if such laws were in effect,” Cain said.

“If Prime Minister Howard thinks that the erosion of fundamental civil liberties fits within community expectations then he’s seriously out of step. You can’t respond like this every time an attack happens in another part of the world,” he said.

The LCA rejected the idea that the laws are a response to the London attacks in July and that they are necessary to protect Australians’ way of life. “The Australian way of life has long been marked by a commitment to the freedoms found in liberal democracies. On the face of it, the proposals seem very heavy handed,” said North.

The LCA called on the Australian people to urge all governments to prove these laws are important. “The only way we can stop the laws being implemented is by the population demanding of their local and federal members that the Government prove that these laws will make us safer. To do this we have to continually speak out publicly and try and stop the Government from bringing laws that will further restrict our freedoms and also allow Australian citizens to be locked up for long periods of time, or shackled with ankle monitoring devises for up to a year,” North told Lawyers Weekly.

“The timing is a real concern because the senate committee which was looking into the existing terrorism laws has still not reported. And the federal Government is raising the ante even more by wanting to bring in even harsher laws. We should get a proper report to see whether any of these laws are really going to have an effect on terrorism. If not, we don’t need them,” North said.

“The Law Council can only continue to involve itself in the public debate and hope that the Government, which said [last week] it is already drafting these laws, will at least let us comment on their effect before they are enacted,” he said.

• The absence of detail about legal representation for detained people (LIV)

• The lack of consultation with the community prior to the Government’s proposing the legislation (LCA)

• The expansion of the State’s detention powers, including preventative detention powers (LIV)

• The lack of a “sunset clause” that would require a review of the necessity of the laws (LIV)

• The lack of detail about the power of the courts to oversee people’s detention (LIV)

• Any increase in ASIO powers needs a high level of justification (LCA)

• Any increase in powers of law enforcement should be focused on the Australian Federal Police (LCA)

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Terror measures anger profession
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Oct 20 2017
Podcast: One of law’s most infamous alumni – in conversation with Julian Morrow
In this episode of The Lawyers Weekly Show, Melissa Coade is joined by The Chaser’s Julian Morrow....
Oct 20 2017
High Court overturns ‘excessive’ anti-protest legislation
Bob Brown’s recent victory in the High Court over the Tasmanian government was a win for fundament...
Oct 20 2017
Changes to Australian citizenship laws blocked
Attempts to beef up the requirements to obtain Australian citizenship were thwarted this week, after...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...