find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Kanye West wins copyright battle

Kanye West wins copyright battle

N-n-now that that don't kill 'Ye, can only make him stronger. Kanye West wins copyright battle with Vince P(eters). King & Wood Mallesons solicitor Philippa Macaskill writes._x000D_

N-n-now that that don't kill 'Ye, can only make him stronger: Kanye West wins copyright battle with Vince P(eters).

Kanye West (or ‘Ye as he’s known) has hit the headlines again this week. Somewhat surprisingly for the rapper, this time it is not for an unprovoked public outburst (need we remind you of the 2009 VMAs where he commandeered the microphone off award winner Taylor Swift) or for his relationship with reality star Kim Kardashian, about whom he wrote the song Perfect B**ch (ah, true love) and who is most famous for her particularly short marriage which lasted all of 72 days. No, this week Kanye is making news for his win in the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in the copyright battle over his 2007 hit song “Stronger”.

As we have previously posted (see here), in 2010 Vincent Peters (aka Vince P) brought copyright infringement proceedings against Kanye in the US District Court alleging that the latter’s song “Stronger” infringed his song of the same name. In particular, Peters alleged infringement in respect of:

  • the hooks of both songs, which derive from Friedrich Nietzsche’s maxim in Twilight of the Idols (1888)
  • that “what does not kill me, makes me stronger”;
  • the songs’ shared title, which also derives from Nietzsche; and
  • the reference in both songs to supermodel Kate Moss.Â

Peters was unsuccessful at first instance and appealed to the Seventh Circuit Court which, in an opinion of Justice Wood handed down last week, affirmed the District Court’s judgment.Â

Image: ‘Kanye-West-grill-glasses-3’ © 14 November 2008, SOCIALisBETTER, used under a Creative Commons Attribution license

In assessing the infringement claim, the Seventh Circuit Court applied a two-prong test whereby it considered first whether Kanye had an opportunity to copy Peters’ song and second whether the two works are substantially similar.Â

On the evidence, the Court found that the first prong was made out. In 2006 Peters approached music producer John Monopoly (who happens to be Kanye’s business manager and close friend) about producing his single “Stronger”. While their professional relationship did not develop further, as a result of their meeting Monopoly had in his possession a copy of Peters’ song. Less than a year later Kanye released his album Graduation, on which the single “Stronger” featured and for which Monopoly was listed as a manager. On this basis, the Court held that there was more than enough evidence to support an inference that Kanye had an opportunity to copy the song.

However, it was the second prong where Peters’ case floundered. The Court held that although both songs quote the German philosopher Nietzsche, which might seem an unusual coincidence at first, this aphorism has been repeatedly invoked in song lyrics over the past century. To illustrate this point, Justice Wood (a closet American Idol fan perhaps?) made particular mention of Kelly Clarkson’s recent hit “Stronger (What doesn’t kill you)”.

Peters argued, though, that it wasn’t just the words used which were similar but also the rhyme patterns. The Court quickly dispensed with this argument, emphasising that copyright protects actual expression, not methods of expression. In the Court’s view, just as a poet could not claim copyright in the form of a sonnet or limerick, nor could Peters claim copyright over a tercet (for those of you whose knowledge of poetic devices is as lacking as ours, this is a group of three lines rhyming together).Â

Finally, Peters argued that references in each song to Kate Moss (his line “Trying to get a model chick like Kate Moss” vs Kanye’s “You could be my black Kate Moss tonight”) were evidence of substantial similarity. The Court disagreed, finding that the lines were entirely different, that Kate Moss’ name alone cannot constitute protectable expression and (with a twinge of regret as to the state of society) that analogising to models as shorthand for beauty is commonplace.Â

Overall, the Seventh Circuit Court concluded that the songs “share only small cosmetic similarities” in that they rhyme similar words, draw from a commonplace maxim and equate beauty with a specific famous model.  While Kanye’s ego hardly seems to be in need of a boost, we can just imagine him celebrating this win by telling himself (and, let’s face it, anyone else who will listen) – “N-n-now that that don’t kill me / Can only make me stronger / I know I got to be right now / Cause Vince P can’t get much wronger”.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Kanye West wins copyright battle
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
microphone
Oct 20 2017
Podcast: One of law’s most infamous alumni – in conversation with Julian Morrow
In this episode of The Lawyers Weekly Show, Melissa Coade is joined by The Chaser’s Julian Morrow....
protest
Oct 20 2017
High Court overturns ‘excessive’ anti-protest legislation
Bob Brown’s recent victory in the High Court over the Tasmanian government was a win for fundament...
Blocked
Oct 20 2017
Changes to Australian citizenship laws blocked
Attempts to beef up the requirements to obtain Australian citizenship were thwarted this week, after...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...