find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Competition, Policy & Regulatory
Category: Other | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Work with a well regarded Partner · Sydney CBD
View details
Commercial Litigation Senior Associate
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Lawyers Weekly Australia Partner of the Year 2016, Insolvency
View details
MULTIPLEX Regional Legal Counsel (Vic) | 7 to 10 years + PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Career defining in-house role · Tier One international contractor
View details
Junior Lawyer - Personal Injury Law
Category: Personal Injury Law | Location: Parramatta & Western Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Highly specialized practice · Challenging role with great opportunities
View details
IR Advisor/Member Advocate
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: St Leonards NSW 2065
· Permanent (0.8-1.0 FTE) role in a developing team
View details
In-house appetite for diverse teams strong

In-house appetite for diverse teams strong

Law firms are being urged to rethink their business model and internal culture to meet the diversity demands of in-house clients.

If money talks, then findings that reveal in-house favour for diversity speak very loudly. Not only are law firms with diverse legal teams considered to be better performers, they also rake in the cash and are more likely to receive a 25 per cent higher share of in-house spend overall.

A legal industry report by Acritas has reiterated the business case for diversity, finding that clients benefit from diversity-driven performance and an increase in high-value outcomes. The research group applied a statistical test to 1,771 client responses from around the world to measure the correlation between diversity and performance among legal teams.

Acritas CEO Lisa Hart-Shepherd suggested that the trends that emerged could not go unnoticed by firms wanting to thrive in a competitive market.

“Surely when law firms understand the financial gains that can be made from allowing more diversity to thrive in their business models, they will start to make the changes that need to happen.

“Now that we have proven that such financial gain can be made from having higher levels of diversity, law firms have to look at their model and adapt,” Ms Hart-Shepherd said.

The 2016 Acritas Diversity Report published the latest results from its ongoing global survey, to offer insights into what in-house counsel look for when choosing a law firm.

Based on the responses, analysts were able to interpret the consumer preferences and behaviours of senior in-house counsel. The report found that overall law firm reputation was more likely to persuade men, while women ranked knowledge and understanding of client business above other business strengths.

“Whilst top quality and specialised knowledge tops the list for both genders, we’ve found that men pay much more attention to the value of the firm … They also look at the breadth of services offer[ed] and the geographic reach.

“Women, on the other hand […] take a commercial and pragmatic approach and really consider efficiency when they’re looking at the way they resource and deliver the services to [the client],” Ms Hart-Shepherd said.

While she acknowledged that this portion of the report relied on generalisations, Ms Hart-Shepherd said the results highlighted the need for law firms to adopt a targeted approach in attracting in-house clients.  

“In reality, we find that not everybody fits the profile, and this really does show the importance of understanding each client individually and making sure that you’re adapting the way that you sell, service and manage these clients,” she said.

Beyond the gender split within teams, responses to the survey also discussed the perception of diversity being affected by years of experience, age, ethnicity, nationality and LGBTQ.

“All of these different findings just show how firms need to adapt the way they sell, manage and service clients to suit their personal preferences,” Ms Hart-Shepherd said.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

In-house appetite for diverse teams strong
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Human body, illegal organ trafficking, ALHR
Sep 22 2017
Australia poised to combat illegal organ harvesting: ALHR
The Australian Lawyers for Human Rights are calling for changes to the law so that organ trafficking...
Online service, barristers, BarristerSELECT, Stephen Foley
Sep 22 2017
New online service leverages barristers’ clerks to aid briefing
A new online tool has been launched to help NSW solicitors find the most suitable barristers for the...
NSW District Court judge, Tim Gartelmann SC, next appointment,
Sep 22 2017
Silk replaces outgoing NSW District Court judge
A barrister has been named as the next appointment to the NSW District Court, following the retireme...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...