find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Anti-terrorism law reform safeguards welcomed

Anti-terrorism law reform safeguards welcomed

The Law Council of Australia has praised the nation’s attorneys-general for maintaining safeguards in discussions of the introduction of new terror laws.

Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull recently said he would table a proposal to allow the extension of convicted terrorists’ sentences beyond their prison terms.

Subsequently the Australian Bar Association and the Law Council of Australia (LCA) warned the government to exercise caution in reforming anti-terrorism legislation, citing the need to safeguard the fundamental legal rights that are central to our democracy.

Federal Attorney-General the Honourable George Brandis QC hosted a meeting and press conference with state and territory attorneys-general on Friday 5 August, to discuss the introduction of a nationally consistent post-sentence preventative detention scheme for high-risk terrorist offenders.

“A post-sentence preventative detention scheme will help to protect the community from terrorist offenders serving custodial sentences who would pose a high risk to the community following their prison sentence,” Mr Brandis QC said ahead of the meeting.

“The highest priority of the government is to ensure the safety of the community. However, the government also recognises it must balance the wellbeing of the community with basic legal rights.”

The meeting concluded with Mr Brandis QC, along with the attorneys-general of NSW, Victoria, Queensland, Western Australia, South Australia and the ACT, as well as a representative of the Attorney-General of Tasmania and the National Counter-Terrorism Coordinator, deciding to make a Commonwealth proposal to amend part 5.3 of the Commonwealth Criminal Code to create such a regime.

Mr Brandis QC made it clear that safeguards would be put in place if such reforms were to go ahead.

“The government proposes that any post-sentence preventative detention regime contain a range of safeguards, including that only a court will be able to decide whether a person should be detained beyond the expiry of their sentence,” Mr Brandis QC said.

“To make a continuing detention order, the court would need to be satisfied to a high degree of probability, on the basis of admissible evidence including experts’ reports and psychological assessments, that the offender posed an unacceptable risk of committing a serious terrorist offence if released into the community, and that no other less restrictive measure would be effective.”

LCA president Stuart Clark AM welcomed the emphasis on maintaining safeguards.

“Keeping Australians safe from terrorism is obviously a profoundly important goal for governments at every level, but altering our post-sentence detention laws must be considered very carefully so as not to compromise the rule of law,” he said.

Mr Clark listed several further safeguards he recommends should be part of any post-sentence detention scheme.

“Applications for post-sentence controls must always be heard by a court where the person who is the subject of the application is given the opportunity to answer the material on which the application is based,” Mr Clark said.

“The scheme must be monitored by those responsible for its administration, the Parliament and the Independent National Security Legislation Monitor, and all orders must be periodically reviewed. The person who is the subject of the order must also be able to apply to the court to have their case reviewed should their circumstances change.”

He added: “There should also be a commitment that any new legislation, at any level, should also be reviewed within three years of its commencement”.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Anti-terrorism law reform safeguards welcomed
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Oct 23 2017
How to fail well
The legal profession is due for an attitude adjustment when it comes to perceived failures, accordin...
Oct 23 2017
Lawyers slam rushed consultation for SA repeat offenders bill
The Law Society of South Australia has expressed concern for a proposal to roll out new laws amendin...
Oct 23 2017
The pursuit of happiness in the law
A panel of legal experts have explored how to define success in the legal profession, and how lawyer...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...