find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
ALRC president calls to enliven 'rights-minded' lawyers

ALRC president calls to enliven 'rights-minded' lawyers

Lawyers should be vigilant of how governments justify laws that encroach on traditional rights and freedoms, the Australian Law Reform Commission president has said.

According to the president of the Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC), scrutinising laws and how they align with traditional rights and freedoms is incumbent on all lawyers.

Delivering the 2016 Mayo Lecture in Townsville last week, Professor Rosalind Croucher said that rights-mindedness should be the mental state of all lawyers.

‘Rights-mindedness’ is a phrase coined by Professor Croucher, who led the ALRC Traditional Rights and Freedoms – Encroachments by Commonwealth Laws inquiry.

“Scrutiny of laws for compatibility with rights may be seen as part of the ‘democratic culture of justification’; or what I have called ‘rights-mindedness’,” Professor Croucher said.

“Asking questions about limitations on rights should become part of the standard vocabulary of lawyers – and law teaching."

The Freedoms Inquiry concluded in its report that the proportionality test, among other tests, was a valuable method to critically analyse the justification of laws limiting traditional rights and freedoms.

Professor Croucher said she believed testing for proportionality was a useful matter of course for law-makers, judicial officers and law reform academics.

“While the ALRC report did not propose that one particular method must always be used to test the justification for laws that limit traditional rights and freedoms […] proportionality tests call for a considerable degree of rigour, and are clearly more thorough than unsupported statements that ‘a law is justified because it is in the public interest’,” Professor Croucher said.

“Importantly, the use of proportionality tests suggests that important rights and freedoms should only be interfered with reluctantly—when truly necessary."

The keynote address explored the mammoth undertaking of what has been described as on of the Commission’s broadest ever inquiries.

The Freedoms Inquiry was commissioned by the government in 2014 and set out to identify and critically examine those Commonwealth laws which may encroach upon traditional rights, freedoms and privileges. The final Freedoms Report was released by the government earlier this year.

In her speech, Professor Croucher illustrated the dynamic relationship between the power of the courts and the executive through the principle of legality and the notion of the ‘supremacy of parliament’.  

“It was an extremely broad reference and also very philosophical on many levels,” Professor Croucher said.

Professor Croucher further noted that the inquiry process was an “enlightening journey”, particularly what it revealed about the embedded nature of rights protection in the common law.

The report offered a timely contribution to broader discourse about the protection of rights in democratic societies, she added.

“I genuinely believe this to be an historic document. Not merely a body of topic specific law reform, which is the usual work of the ALRC, but a benchmark document which will be serviceable to governments and parliaments in all the years to come,” she said.

Professor Rosalind Croucher

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

ALRC president calls to enliven 'rights-minded' lawyers
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...