find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Property lawyer - Melbourne
Category: Property Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Impressive client list, national firm · Well-led and high-performing team
View details
Senior family lawyer - Melbourne
Category: Family Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Outstanding national firm · High-calibre family law team
View details
Calls for closer ties between ASX and ASIC

Calls for closer ties between ASX and ASIC

THE AUSTRALIAN Stock Exchange (ASX) and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) should work more closely on corporate governance issues, according to two leading…

THE AUSTRALIAN Stock Exchange (ASX) and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) should work more closely on corporate governance issues, according to two leading academics.

James McConvill and Professor Mirko Bagaric of Deakin University Law School said there are weaknesses in Australia’s corporate governance regulatory framework relating to the responsibilities of supervisory, regulatory and enforcement agencies.

The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development’s (OECD’s) principles on an effective corporate governance framework are currently not being met with respect to the division of responsibilities. The answer, McConvill said, could be a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between ASIC and the ASX.

“From a day to day practical perspective, if ASIC is doing surveillance of a listed public company and discovers that practices infringe the ASX principles in addition to a breach of the Corporations Act, the question is what should it do about it?” McConvill said.

“Should there be formal arrangements in place? There is a memorandum of understanding between ASIC and the ASX, but that preceded the most recent developments in corporate regulation. Now we are in the post Enron, post HIH period, where corporate governance is heavily regulated, the suggestion is that some thought should be given to how the relationship between the ASX and ASIC should play out in practice given that they are two key regulators with an important mandate in the governance area.”

The ASX principles of good corporate governance are voluntary, and companies choosing not to comply must explain why in their annual reports. It is then left to shareholders to decide whether any action is necessary. However, according to McConvill, they are based on an ASX listing rule. “The question is if there is a violation of an ASX principle and the ASX doesn’t want to do anything about it, can ASIC take any action in terms of its tough stance on corporate governance and intervene?” said McConvill.

“It becomes quite tricky because while the ASX principles are voluntary, they are based on an ASX listing rule (10.3) so an actual contravention or failure to comply with a principle actually gives rise to a breach of the listing rules if the company doesn’t adequately disclose why they haven’t complied. In that situation, ASIC can enforce a breach of listing rules under the Corporations Act.”

While there has always been healthy communication between ASIC and the ASX, formalizing that relationship could shore up corporate governance regulation. “ASX and ASIC will probably have some informal arrangement whereby one particular department can speak to another in ASX and ASIC and vice versa about a particular matter and they can share information,” McConvill said.

There is also a case for the Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority (APRA) to be included. While APRA has taken some criticism of its forays into the corporate governance area, it is likely to continue. APRA has an MOU with ASIC on information sharing and mutual assistance.

Stuart Fagg is the Editor of Risk Management magazine,Lawyers Weeklys sister publication.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Calls for closer ties between ASX and ASIC
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Warning
Aug 23 2017
NT Law Society sounds alarm on mandatory sentencing
The Law Society Northern Territory has issued a warning over mandatory sentencing, saying it hasn’...
Unite
Aug 22 2017
Professionals unite in support of marriage equality
The presidents of representative bodies for solicitors, barristers and doctors in NSW have come toge...
Aug 21 2017
Is your firm on the right track for gig economy gains?
Promoted by Crowd & Co. The way we do business, where we work, how we engage with workers, ev...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...