find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Government vetoes defence lawyers: LCA

Government vetoes defence lawyers: LCA

THE PEAK BODY representing the legal profession has condemned new national security laws introduced into Parliament last week. While the Federal Government claims the new laws demonstrate its…

THE PEAK BODY representing the legal profession has condemned new national security laws introduced into Parliament last week.

While the Federal Government claims the new laws demonstrate its determination to “get on with the job” of ensuring Australia’s counter-terrorism legislative regime remains responsive to the war on terror, the Law Council of Australia (LCA) is concerned by the prospect of defence lawyers having to undergo a government sanctioned security clearance in some cases.

The federal Attorney-General Philip Ruddock last week introduced the National Security Information (Criminal Proceedings) Bill 2004 and the National Security Information (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2004.

The Bills are aimed at strengthening laws to ensure protection of sensitive information where it is disclosed during the course of criminal proceedings. They will also ensure a trial is fair and the defendant is not disadvantaged, according to a statement made by the Attorney-General.

But the new laws still worry the LCA. Steve Southwood QC, president of the LCA, said last week that, as presently proposed, they would still restrict an accused person’s right to a lawyer of their choice.

“We remain concerned by the prospect of defence lawyers having to undergo a government sanctioned security clearance in order to represent clients in cases with alleged national security overtones,” Southwood said.

As well, the legislation requires courts to give greater weight to national security, making it a higher priority than an accused person’s right to a fair trial when making orders about the non disclosure of information or witness exclusions.

The LCA is not opposed to reasonable legislation which would improve court procedures in relation to managing security-sensitive information, Southwood said.

“However, any changes to the current approach must be balanced against the need to ensure courts retain adequate discretion over the process and that the fair trial values essential to our system of justice are preserved. In our view, the Bills as presently constituted do not achieve such a balance,” Southwood said.

The National Security Information Bill was reintroduced after originally being introduced into the House of Representatives in May this year. The Bill did not pass before the dissolution of Parliament for the federal election.

Criminal prosecutions for federal security offences, such as terrorism and espionage, may rely on information that can affect the national security of the country, the Attorney-General said in a statement.

But the current situation could force the Commonwealth to decide between risking the disclosure of sensitive information and protecting the information and thereby abandoning the prosecution.

The Director-General of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO), Dennis Richardson, recently told the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry that the protection of classified information would eventually be a critical issue in the case of a terrorism trial.

Ruddock said the new legislation was a means to avoiding this situation.

The LCA argued that recommendations made by a bi-partisan committee had been overlooked, including that courts won’t have the discretion to determine the extent to which a court transcript should be sealed.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Government vetoes defence lawyers: LCA
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Consultation
06:04
Lawyers slam rushed consultation for SA repeat offenders bill
The Law Society of South Australia has expressed concern for a proposal to roll out new laws amendin...
IBA
06:03
The pursuit of happiness in the law
A panel of legal experts have explored how to define success in the legal profession, and how lawyer...
Queensland University of Technology, ruby milestone
06:00
Queensland law school reaches ruby milestone
Celebrating 40 years since establishing a law course in 1977, the Queensland University of Technolog...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...