find the latest legal job
Corporate/Commercial Lawyers (2-5 years PAE)
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Specialist commercial law firm · Long-term career progression
View details
Graduate Lawyer / Up to 1.5 yr PAE Lawyer
Category: Personal Injury Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Mentoring Opportunity in Regional QLD · Personal Injury Law
View details
Corporate and Commercial Partner
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: Adelaide SA 5000
· Full time · Join a leading Adelaide commercial law firm
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Sydney NSW
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
In-house Legal Counsel & Commercial Lawyers
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· Providing lawyers with flexibility and control over when they work, how they work and who they work for.
View details
The legal war against fat

The legal war against fat

THERE IS a saying that you can’t legislate on common sense. But as obesity rates and healthcare costs soar, causing lost productivity into the billions, governments are starting to do just…

THERE IS a saying that you can’t legislate on common sense. But as obesity rates and healthcare costs soar, causing lost productivity into the billions, governments are starting to do just that.

California recently passed a ban on trans-fats (fats derived from partially hydrogenated oils), which have long been linked to health problems such as heart attacks and obesity. New York City, Baltimore, Boston, and Philadelphia have adopted similar bans, as has Denmark. South Australia is leading the charge for a national ban there.

Under the Californian law, to be phased in from 2010, all “food facilities” will have to stop using oils, margarine, and shortening containing trans-fats, and cooking products will have to be labelled for inspection purposes. Fines will range between $25 and $1000 for violations of the ban.

Opposition to the law came mainly from the California Restaurant Association, which, the New York Times reported, argued it would be an expensive move that should be decided by the federal, rather than state, government.

But many fast-food chains, including Dunkin’ Donuts, and some restaurants, have already cut their use of trans-fats to keep up with public mood.

Fatty foods, it seems, are becoming the cigarettes of yesteryear.

England has a special tax for fatty and salty foods, while France is considering a 14.1 per cent increase in taxes on delicacies such as foie gras and pastries.

Meanwhile the New York Times reveals that New York requires restaurants to provide a calorie breakdown on menus, and the Los Angeles City Council last month introduced a year-long moratorium on new fast-food restaurants in some of its poorest neighbourhoods in what appears to be the first ban on a style of restaurant for health reasons A Los Angles radio host denounced the prohibition, saying it assumes people who live in the area are “intellectually incapable of deciding what to eat,” reported the New York Times. Men’s Health Magazine editor-in-chief and diet book author David Zinczenko, who was interviewed for the same article, had a different take. “I think you can begin to put together a case for governmental intervention,” he said, referring to the “monopolisation of our dietary intake by a handful of corporations” and the fact that a piece of fruit costs at least twice as much as a few Chicken McNuggets.

New Zealand has also joined the cause. The Public Health Bill covers everything from what goes in school lunch boxes to physical activity and food advertising, and new healthy eating guidelines are designed to combat obesity by forcing schools to sell healthy food. Neither has escaped opposition.

It is difficult to strike a balance between improving and protecting public health while maintaining individual freedom. However, one must ask how much respect the freedom to become a rotund and costly health catastrophe — and the right to assist people in getting there — really deserves.

Surely the obesity epidemic deserves more than public complacency.

This story first appeared in NZ Lawyer.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

The legal war against fat
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Scales of Justice
Dec 15 2017
Timing ‘critical’ in unusual contempt of court ruling
A recent case could have interesting implications for contempt of court rulings, according to a Ferr...
Dec 14 2017
International arbitration and business culture
Promoted by Maxwell Chambers. This article discusses the impact of international arbitration on t...
Papua New Guinea flag
Dec 14 2017
World-first mining case launched in PNG
Citizens of Papua New Guinea have launched landmark legal proceedings against the country’s govern...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...