find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Corporate Lawyer
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· 12 months fixed term opportunity
View details
Property lawyer - Melbourne
Category: Property Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Impressive client list, national firm · Well-led and high-performing team
View details
Jailing jurors doesn’t work

Jailing jurors doesn’t work

The jury system must catch up with the realities of the 21st century and criminal sanctions won’t stop jurors conducting online research, according to an expert on the civil jury system.

The jury system must catch up with the realities of the 21st century and criminal sanctions won’t stop jurors conducting online research, according to an expert on the civil jury system.

Dr Jacqueline Horan, a barrister and senior lecturer at the University of Melbourne’s faculty of law, told Lawyers Weekly the jury system is out of step with the modern age.

“Jurors of the 21st century are highly educated people. The old-fashioned jury system was set up at a time when juries were illiterate,” she said.

“The system has to update itself to keep in touch with the average citizen of the 21st century.”

Horan’s comments come in the wake of yesterday’s (23 January) British High Court ruling that will see a former university lecturer spend six months behind bars for conducting online research during a trial in which she was a juror.

The Guardian reported that Theodora Dallas conducted online research at home while she was a juror in 2011. Dallas told other members of the jury what she had discovered about the defendant, Barry Medlock, who was being tried for causing grievous bodily harm.

The judge was forced to stop the case from proceeding after discovering Dallas’s conduct. Medlock was later retried and found guilty.

The Dallas case is one of a growing list of international and homegrown cases in which jurors have been caught using social media sites, such as Facebook and Twitter, or conducting their own research online, often resulting in aborted trials and, increasingly, criminal sanctions for jurors.

According to Horan, however, laws against such actions are ineffective and unlikely to prevent jurors from self-educating or interacting online.

“People are not going to stop doing research. That is the way we are taught these days,” said Horan. “Students are taught to look up Wikipedia if they don’t understand language.”

Horan highlighted the case of Abdul Nacer Benbrika, who was found guilty of leading a terrorist group in Sydney and Melbourne in 2008. In that matter, jurors were found with their own research in the jury room. It was discussed in court and they were told they couldn’t access information online but, as the case went on, more illicit research was conducted.

“You can’t stop people from doing it. They want to do a good job,” she said. “If they’ve got the choice between doing a good job and getting a criminal sanction, they’ll do a good job. It’s somebody’s life and liberty at stake. Giving them a criminal sanction doesn’t work.”

However, legal ethicist and consultant Neil Watt told Lawyers Weekly that when jurors disobey directions to refrain from conducting their own research, it has the potential to undermine the entire justice system.

“In principle, the ethical perspective is that jurors must be committed to forming their own conclusions based on the facts presented in court rather than the untested opinions in the media or elsewhere,” he said. “It has always been the case that this involves an avoidance of personal investigation. The ease of online news sources and social media doesn’t change this, and it would weaken our system of justice if accused people were denied trial by their peers because they might be tempted to fossick on the internet.”

Horan believes, however, that more needs to be done to ensure that jurors know exactly what they can and can’t do when it comes to accessing information, and said current methods of instruction – which are primarily oral and based on traditional legal language – are insufficient for the modern juror.

“Jurors don’t get anything [presented] to them in visual terms. They don’t get any written instruction to confirm things like, ‘Don’t go and tweet to your friends about this, because if you do it might influence you and that would be inappropriate,” said Horan.

“At the beginning of a trial, jurors are told all these instructions and they’re expected to remember it. They’re in a new environment, they’re quite intimidated, there’s lots going on, and I don’t think they appreciate the gravity of it.”

In recent years, some changes have been made to the jury system, and jurors are now allowed to take notes and review transcripts – something Horan describes as a “no-brainer”.

But this progress, she said, is not necessarily indicative of a wider push to initiate more change within the jury system.

“[That] is a great step forward … but it is the result of a monumental struggle over the last few years,” she said. “To me, the key is to change the legal culture, but I haven’t felt any major movement towards overhauling the system.”

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Jailing jurors doesn’t work
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Warning
Aug 23 2017
NT Law Society sounds alarm on mandatory sentencing
The Law Society Northern Territory has issued a warning over mandatory sentencing, saying it hasn’...
Unite
Aug 22 2017
Professionals unite in support of marriage equality
The presidents of representative bodies for solicitors, barristers and doctors in NSW have come toge...
Aug 21 2017
Is your firm on the right track for gig economy gains?
Promoted by The way we do business, where we work, how we engage with workers, even how we take a...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...