While vacancies at private practice firms have all but dried up, the downturn has lead to a spike in corporate and government in-house employment opportunities.According to Katherine Sampson,…
While vacancies at private practice firms have all but dried up, the downturn has lead to a spike in corporate and government in-house employment opportunities.
To continue reading the rest of this article, please log in.
Create free account to get unlimited news articles and more!
According to Katherine Sampson, Mahlab Recruitment's managing director in Melbourne, corporate and government organisations often attempt to bolster their internal legal capacity during a downturn because they view it as a cheaper alternative to briefing work out to external firms.
"We find, in any downturn, one of the immediate things that happens is that corporate recruitment rises ... [and] we've got more government recruitment than we've had for years," she said.
"It's based on their assumption - and I'm not saying it's a true assumption - that they will save money."
According to Sampson, corporate and government organisations believe that reducing the volume of work being briefed out to firms is a quick-fix way of cutting costs.
"They're saying:'If we take on a lawyer for $200,000 we're going to save $X million in external legal fees.' It's quite a simplistic view, but it's one that's strongly held," she said.
For the latest news, views and analysis of issues affecting in-house lawyers, check out Lawyers Weekly's dedicated in-house site www.lawyersinhouse.com.au