find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Deal or No Deal? reveals risk aversion

Deal or No Deal? reveals risk aversion

The popular television game show, Deal or No Deal?, has become the unlikely subject of serious risk analysis. Mark Phillips reports.MELBOURNE: In an innovative departure from the norm, a new…

The popular television game show, Deal or No Deal?, has become the unlikely subject of serious risk analysis. Mark Phillips reports.

MELBOURNE: In an innovative departure from the norm, a new study in the International Review of Finance used data from the popular television game show, Deal or No Deal?, to explore risk aversion and economic decision-making behaviours of individuals in a high-stakes setting.

Apparently the setting of the game show provides an ideal condition for studying a range of issues relating to risk aversion. It begins with 26 suitcases of prizes ranging from 50 cents to 200,000, with most of the prize money amounting to $US10,000 and below. The contestants are asked to select one suitcase to be set aside, and then asked to continue eliminating the rest of the suitcases by choosing between the offers made by the bank, or staking their chances on an unknown amount in any particular suitcase.

The study, Deal or No Deal, That is the Question: The Impact of Increasing Stakes and Framing Effects on Decision-Making under Risk, examines the statistics from 102 episodes of the Australian version of the game show.

Findings showed that while risk aversion increased with the stakes, people were generally willing to bear risks despite very high stakes. Researchers also found that males were more willing to take risk and less likely to be swayed by a positive counter offer. While gender and age are significant determinants of risk aversion, it found, wealth was not a factor when establishing a person's risk behaviour.

"The analysis of decisions under uncertainty is fundamental to modern economics and finance," said co-author of the report, Professor Robert Faff, from the Department of Accounting and Finance at Monash University.

"By studying contestant choices in Deal or No Deal? we were able to explore risk aversion in the context of both very high and wide-ranging pay-offs. It also allowed us to answer questions including heterogeneity and how this varies with demographic characteristics such as age, wealth and gender."

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Deal or No Deal? reveals risk aversion
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...