find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Litigation funding future in doubt after court decision

Litigation funding future in doubt after court decision

A Federal Court decision handed down on Tuesday has thrown a spanner in the works for the future of litigation funding arrangements.In the decision of Brookfield Multiplex Limited v…

A Federal Court decision handed down on Tuesday has thrown a spanner in the works for the future of litigation funding arrangements.

In the decision of Brookfield Multiplex Limited v International Litigation Funding Partners Pte Ltd [2009] FCAFC 147, the Full Federal Court, in a 2-1 majority, found that a litigation funding arrangement for a class action against two Brookfield Multiplex parties constituted an unregistered managed investment scheme, contrary to the provisions of the Corporations Act 2001. At the time of writing final orders had not been given, but Brookfield is seeking an injunction to put a stop to the class action.

The action is being taken on behalf of Brookfield Multiplex shareholders by Maurice Blackburn, and is being funded through an arrangement with International Litigation Funding Partners. It relates to Brookfield Multiplex's alleged failure to disclose cost blowouts in the construction of Wembley Stadium in London.

Speaking to Lawyers Weekly today, Maurice Blackburn partner Andrew Watson said that he was disappointed by the court's finding, and that the firm was currently reviewing its options, including a High Court appeal. "Over view in relation to the judgment is a disappointing one. Until we get orders we can't institute any appeal, but we are actively considering a special leave application [to the High Court]," he said. "We are also considering what, if any, steps we ought to take to ensure the class action can proceed in the meantime."

Watson explained that the firm is considering three potential courses of action to keep the class action on foot.

Firstly, he said, there is a possibility under the Corporations Act of getting an exemption from ASIC. The second option would be to actually set up the proper architecture for a valid managed investment scheme, however he admitted this wasn't a preferable course of action.

"That's not a particularly attractive option because you end up with this enormous architecture of a responsible entity and a constitution and all of that, all just for the sake of dealing with the funding arrangements for a particular proceeding," he explained.

"And in circumstances where we're subject to the supervision of the court - and class actions themselves are already subject to extensive legislative and court regulation - it just seems like frankly overkill to do all of that."

The final option would be to reconfigure the funding arrangement so it would fall out of the scope of an unregistered managed investment scheme.

"There are a variety of options for reconfiguration, but probably the easiest is just to continue the funding arrangements for those persons who are not within the meaning of the Corporations Act [definition] of 'retail clients'," he said.

He emphasised that if this option was pursued, retail clients would still have their action pursued; they just wouldn't be subject to the litigation funding arrangement. "They would continue to have a class action on foot, they just wouldn't have the funding," he said.

Watson added that he believed the outcome of the case would likely have implications for other class actions the firm is running. "Each funding arrangement will differ, but I think it's fair to say that on the broadest reading of what the [majority] judges have said in this case, there are likely to be implications for other actions," he said.

- Zoe Lyon

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Litigation funding future in doubt after court decision
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Oct 23 2017
How to fail well
The legal profession is due for an attitude adjustment when it comes to perceived failures, accordin...
Oct 23 2017
Lawyers slam rushed consultation for SA repeat offenders bill
The Law Society of South Australia has expressed concern for a proposal to roll out new laws amendin...
Oct 23 2017
The pursuit of happiness in the law
A panel of legal experts have explored how to define success in the legal profession, and how lawyer...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...