find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Lunchtime over for lawyers on human rights

Lunchtime over for lawyers on human rights

Following recommendations by the National Human Rights Consultation that Australia adopt a human rights act, can lawyers still be accused of supporting such an initiative merely out of self…

Following recommendations by the National Human Rights Consultation that Australia adopt a human rights act, can lawyers still be accused of supporting such an initiative merely out of self interest?

It has been debated ad nauseum, but the Federal Attorney General finally has a full list of recommendations from the National Human Rights Consultation (NHRC) for the consideration of a human rights act.

All in all, there were 27,888 submissions supporting a human rights act, making up 87 per cent of the total submissions received during the consultation process.

"That is a very, very strong majority of support for such a reform, and it is also worth mentioning that it is consistent with all of the major opinion polling that I'm aware of in the last 10 years of so," Ed Santow, director of the Charter of Human Rights Project at the Gilbert & Tobin Centre of Public Law, told Lawyers Weekly following the release of the full report earlier this month.

The NHRC has recommended Australia adopt a dialogue model of a human rights act - similar to that already implemented in the Australian Capital Territory and Victoria. The committee fundamentally reported a lack of understanding in Australia as to what human rights are, formulating the need for an improved human rights culture and the need for human rights education in schools.

But those opposed to a human rights act remain stanch in their criticism. Some argue that a charter would give too much power to the hands of unelected judicial officials, and also go one step further, claiming a charter will have only one group of beneficiaries - lawyers.

George Brandis SC, a long-time opponent of a human rights act and Shadow Attorney-General said following the release of the report that: "This recommendation is the ultimate triumph of the elites. The Government should reject it. If it proposes to adopt it, it should put it to the people."

He added that: "This entire process has been driven by a small group of academics, lawyers and political activists."

Meanwhile, The Australian newspaper claims a human rights culture would lead only to a "litigation neverland".

For the elites only?

Santow is quick to debate the point that any human rights act would serve the needs of lawyers and lawyers only. He claims that the model recommended by the committee has been carefully planned to reflect the experience of other jurisdictions where the implementation of such a model has not led to an increase in business or fees for those involved in the legal process.

"The main gain in this kind of human rights act model is not in the courts; it is designed to prevent human rights abuses from occurring before they end up in high litigation," he says. "It is unlikely that it will lead to either a large increase in lawyers' work, or for that matter an increase in litigation."

Mark Blumer, national president of the Australian Lawyers Alliance, concurs. "People who will have recourse to a human rights act are people who don't usually have any money; they are usually marginalised people," he says. "Lawyers who act for these people don't usually do it for the money."

Father Frank Brennan, who headed up the NHRC, himself refuted claims that lawyers would be the only winners of a human rights act in his address to the National Press Club last week. He said that, instead of leading to an increase in litigation, it will actually enhance the role of Commonwealth public authorities in ensuring human rights in the first place - therefore potentially eliminating the need for litigation later on.

From picnic, to reputation building

In some areas of the public's view and indeed some aspects of the mainstream media, it's believed that lawyers only advocate enshrining human rights in law out of self-interest. Could such an implication arise out of a tarnished reputation of lawyers in the general community?

Lawyers will no doubt play a major role in the promotion of human rights, and any establishment of a human rights act in Australia.

But rather than leading to a lawyer's picnic, perhaps this could be the opportunity that Clara Davies, former president of the Australian Lawyers Alliance recently told Lawyers Weekly the profession needs in order to claw back its reputation.

"Maybe this is one area where many of us can actually give back," she said.

Are lawyers the beneficiaries of a human rights act? Have your say below:

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Lunchtime over for lawyers on human rights
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...