find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Patent test case breaks new ground

Patent test case breaks new ground

In the first case of its kind in Australia, a legal challenge has today been launched against four biotech companies which hold patents over human genetic material.Launched in the Federal Court…

In the first case of its kind in Australia, a legal challenge has today been launched against four biotech companies which hold patents over human genetic material.

Launched in the Federal Court by plaintiff firm Maurice Blackburn, on behalf of Cancer Voices Australia and breast cancer patient Yvonne D'Arcy, the case centres on the patent over a gene mutation known as BRCA1, which is linked to an increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer.

Maurice Blackburn is arguing that the patent held by companies such as US-based Myriad Genetics Inc and

Melbourne-based Genetic Technologies Ltd is invalid.

In March this year, the Federal District Court in New York found that patents had been improperly granted to Myriad Genetics in regards to two human genes, including BRCA1.

The current case, which is essentially a test case for Australia, is supported by patent law expert Dr Luigi Palombi from the Australian National University and Sydney University. Maurice Blackburn's Rebecca Gilsenan will run the case on a pro bono basis in conjunction with barristers David Catterns QC and Peter Cashman.

"There is a philosophical and ethical issue about the commercialisation of the human body. Beyond that, there is a practical concern - the patent owner has a right to prevent people from studying and testing for the gene mutation, so gene patents can stifle research, the development of treatments, and access to diagnostic testing," Gilsenan said.

"Patents protect inventions, not discoveries. What Myriad has done is discovered and isolated the gene from the human body. We will argue that that does not and can not amount to a patentable invention."

Cancer Voices, a national consumer organisation, is the first applicant in the case and said it has a "fervent interest" in ensuring cancer patients have access to the best available treatment options.

"Cancer diagnosis is a time of stress for all people affected by cancer," said executive officer John Stubbs.

"We want control over our disease and treatment options. Patents have the potential to increase the cost of treating all cancers and perhaps denying a vital pathway to good treatment outcomes."

Yvonne D'Arcy, the second applicant, said she believes patents over human genes are morally reprehensible.

"It's just not right that a company can come along and say that it owns a gene and then control how you get tested for it and who can test you," she said.

"A company shouldn't be able to own genes - they belong to everybody."

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Patent test case breaks new ground
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
High Court overturns ‘excessive’ anti-protest legislation
Bob Brown’s recent victory in the High Court over the Tasmanian government was a win for fundament...
Changes to Australian citizenship laws blocked
Attempts to beef up the requirements to obtain Australian citizenship were thwarted this week, after...
Lawyers warn against mandatory sentencing measures amid political jeers
Mandatory sentencing has become a topic for politicians on both sides of Federal Parliament to jostl...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...