find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
US court bans highway crosses

US court bans highway crosses

The American Federal Appeals Court has found that highway crosses erected on public roads in Utah are unconstitutional and must be removed.The Utah Highway Patrol Association (UHPA) has erected…

The American Federal Appeals Court has found that highway crosses erected on public roads in Utah are unconstitutional and must be removed.

The Utah Highway Patrol Association (UHPA) has erected 14 crosses since 1998 to honour dead highway troopers. Even though the UHPA is privately funded and the crosses are privately maintained, they are erected on public land and contain the state insignia.

The Court ruled yesterday (18 August) that passing motorists would view the crosses as "a government endorsement of Christianity" and therefore, they are unconstitutional.

The Court rejected the notion that many other roads throughout the USA contain memorial crosses to honour dead citizens. The Court found that the crosses in Utah, by their size and erection on public property "are far different from the more humble spirit of small roadside crosses".

A challenge to the constitutional validity was first mounted by a group called American Atheist Inc in 2005. A Federal Judge in Salt Lake City found that the crosses were secular in nature and symbols of sacrifice in 2007, and allowed them to remain.

The decision of a three-judge panel of the 10 circuit US Court of Appeal yesterday reversed that decision.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

US court bans highway crosses
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
microphone
Oct 20 2017
Podcast: One of law’s most infamous alumni – in conversation with Julian Morrow
In this episode of The Lawyers Weekly Show, Melissa Coade is joined by The Chaser’s Julian Morrow....
protest
Oct 20 2017
High Court overturns ‘excessive’ anti-protest legislation
Bob Brown’s recent victory in the High Court over the Tasmanian government was a win for fundament...
Blocked
Oct 20 2017
Changes to Australian citizenship laws blocked
Attempts to beef up the requirements to obtain Australian citizenship were thwarted this week, after...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...