find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Corporate Lawyer
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· 12 months fixed term opportunity
View details
Property lawyer - Melbourne
Category: Property Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Impressive client list, national firm · Well-led and high-performing team
View details
No increase in High Court’s multiple majority judgements

No increase in High Court’s multiple majority judgements

NEW RESEARCH on the High Court has countered suggestions that contemporary judges deliver more multiple majority judgements than their predecessors.The research, conducted by academics from…

NEW RESEARCH on the High Court has countered suggestions that contemporary judges deliver more multiple majority judgements than their predecessors.

The research, conducted by academics from Deakin Law School, shows that there is no evidence to suggest that the High Court is now more fragmented than it has been during other periods of history.

Such criticisms of the High Court impair its capacity to clarify and unify the law, thus making it more difficult for citizens to coordinate their affairs, the researchers suggest.

In an interview with Lawyers Weekly, Mirko Bagaric, head of Deakin Law School, said the High Court has recently been criticised for a supposed divided approach to decision making. But his research, conducted with Deakin Law School lecturer James McConvill, shows that there were as many separate majority judgements 50 years ago as there are now.

In a speech to the Constitutional Law Conference in Sydney earlier this year, Chief Justice Gleeson stated that the doctrine of precedent could be harmed by multiple majority judgements.

Spurred on by these comments, Bagaric decided to examine the presupposed argument and whether there is justification for the practice of joint majority judgements. His research provided a statistical breakdown of the structure of the High Court decisions in the most recent full calendar year (2003) and compare them with the figures from a decade ago (1993), 25 years ago and approximately 50 years ago (1954). The years were chosen at random, he said. Because the High Court has comprised seven judges only since 1946, the research does not go further back than this.

The figures show that the High Court is “in fact not now more divided in its judgement writing process than during any of the other periods,” Bagaric said.

The most telling statistic found in the research, Bagaric told Lawyers Weekly, is that the greater the number of judges there are, the greater the opportunity for disagreement. The principal criticism levelled at the Court recently has been the number of separate concurring judgements.

By dividing the percentage of cases where there is more than one majority decision by the average number of justices hearing a decision, the researchers found that the proportion of decisions involving at least one separate concurring judgement relative to the average number of justices hearing a case is relatively stable over the surveyed period. It stayed at about 12 per cent, except in 2003, when the fragmentation index halved.

“So when you go back 10, 25 or 50 years, there is no evidence that the High Court is more divided in its approach than it was in the past,” he said.

“The perceived individualistic approach taken by the High Court to decision making in recent years has been subject to a significant degree of criticism. This criticism is not sound,” the research paper states.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

No increase in High Court’s multiple majority judgements
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Warning
Aug 23 2017
NT Law Society sounds alarm on mandatory sentencing
The Law Society Northern Territory has issued a warning over mandatory sentencing, saying it hasn’...
Unite
Aug 22 2017
Professionals unite in support of marriage equality
The presidents of representative bodies for solicitors, barristers and doctors in NSW have come toge...
Aug 21 2017
Is your firm on the right track for gig economy gains?
Promoted by The way we do business, where we work, how we engage with workers, even how we take a...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...