find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Property lawyer - Melbourne
Category: Property Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Impressive client list, national firm · Well-led and high-performing team
View details
Senior family lawyer - Melbourne
Category: Family Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Outstanding national firm · High-calibre family law team
View details
Judges’ pay increase should come now: Vic Bar

Judges’ pay increase should come now: Vic Bar

THE VICTORIAN Government’s apparent confidence in its judges and magistrates, after they won a pay rise that will bring them in line with their federal colleagues, was in fact questionable,…

THE VICTORIAN Government’s apparent confidence in its judges and magistrates, after they won a pay rise that will bring them in line with their federal colleagues, was in fact questionable, argued the State’s peak judicial body.

The Victorian Bar Council welcomed the pay rise, but the increase was “half good, half bad”, and “the right thing to do would have been to follow the recommendations made last month by the Judicial Remuneration Tribunal and give judges a pay increase immediately, not over four years”, said Victorian Bar Council chairman Robin Brett QC.

Attorney-General Rob Hulls said last week he would introduce legislation to phase in the salary parity by the 2007-2008 financial year. On Wednesday he moved that the Bill be read; the debate, however, was adjourned until 26 May.

The Judicial Salaries Bill was introduced to remove the function of the Judicial Remuneration Tribunal to make determinations in relation to the salaries and allowances of judges and magistrates. It came as a result of the Government’s rejection last month of the Tribunal’s determination in relation to judicial salaries which would have resulted in a 13.6 per cent pay rise for judges and magistrates.

At the time, the rejection prompted outrage from the judiciary, which claimed the decision would make judges and magistrates in Victoria the lowest paid in Australia.

The Government believed that the Tribunal’s determinations were beyond community expectations, Hulls said. This was the explanation for the Government’s motion in state parliament to disallow the Judicial Remuneration Tribunal’s determination.

But the Government said it also believed judges deserved appropriate remuneration, which was its reasoning for legislating to allow for the phasing in of salary parity over the next four years.“Federal linkage will ensure that judicial salaries are commensurate with the status and responsibility of judicial office, and ensure we continue to attract suitable candidates to judicial office, particularly in the higher jurisdictions,” Hulls said.

Any system of judicial remuneration would also have to give careful regard to the principles of judicial independence, he said.

The new structure will be phased in over four years. At the end of that period the salaries of Victorian Supreme Court judges will be linked to those of the Federal Court.

The Victorian Bar Council welcomed the pay increase for judges and magistrates. “We’re very glad judges will eventually be paid what their federal counterparts are paid,” said Brett. But it was a pity, he said, that it was going to take so long for judges and magistrates to actually see this increase.

Going on statements he had received, Brett said it appeared that judges and magistrates would receive an immediate 3 per cent pay rise. They will receive a further 3 per cent in the next financial year, and then a series of increases bringing them to parity with their federal counterparts, he said.

But the Government should have implemented the initial recommendation by the Tribunal, Brett said. This would have seen an immediate pay rise of over 13 per cent and that would have been appropriate, he suggested.

In an interview with Lawyers Weekly a month ago, Brett said the Victorian Bar Council was “very disappointed” that the Government had rejected the pay rise recommendation. He said this was effectively the Government saying it would be happy for Victorian judges to be paid less than their colleagues in other states. Also, the Government had expressed a “lack of confidence in Victorian courts as well as the state’s judges”.

Last week, Brett said this was still true to an extent. Although it appeared to show confidence, he said the right thing to do would have been to follow the Tribunal’s recommendations.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Judges’ pay increase should come now: Vic Bar
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Warning
Aug 23 2017
NT Law Society sounds alarm on mandatory sentencing
The Law Society Northern Territory has issued a warning over mandatory sentencing, saying it hasn’...
Unite
Aug 22 2017
Professionals unite in support of marriage equality
The presidents of representative bodies for solicitors, barristers and doctors in NSW have come toge...
Aug 21 2017
Is your firm on the right track for gig economy gains?
Promoted by Crowd & Co. The way we do business, where we work, how we engage with workers, ev...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...