find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Property lawyer - Melbourne
Category: Property Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Impressive client list, national firm · Well-led and high-performing team
View details
Senior family lawyer - Melbourne
Category: Family Law | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Outstanding national firm · High-calibre family law team
View details
Ruddock should intervene in Nauru: LIV

Ruddock should intervene in Nauru: LIV

THE LAW Institute of Victoria has urged federal Attorney-General Philip Ruddock to intervene and assist a team of Australian lawyers to travel to Nauru to help determine the legality of…

THE LAW Institute of Victoria has urged federal Attorney-General Philip Ruddock to intervene and assist a team of Australian lawyers to travel to Nauru to help determine the legality of detaining asylum seekers on the island nation before the Nauruan Supreme Court.

The Australian lawyers were seeking to ensure that the asylum seekers’ arguments on the legality of their detention in Nauru were argued fully and expertly.

Following reports last week that the asylum seekers in Nauru were instead being represented by a local paralegal — actually Nauruan justice minister Russell Kun’s uncle — the Law Institute said it was unlikely all the legal arguments would be expertly argued.

The paralegal pleader will reportedly only read notes prepared by Melbourne lawyer Julian Burnside QC, and will not argue the case. In contrast, senior Australian lawyers, paid by the Australian Government, will represent the Nauruan and Australian governments. The Law Institute noted that the judgement of the Supreme Court was therefore unlikely to command respect.

The furore followed recent events which saw representatives for the asylum seekers, led by Burnside, prevented from entering Nauru because of visa difficulties.

It has been reported that a spokesperson for the Nauruan Government said the Minister for Justice had blocked the team’s visas on the basis that there was sufficient representation for the asylum seekers on the island.

Victorian Bar Council chairman Robin Brett QC claimed this was no justification. “Justice requires that every litigant should have the right to be represented by the lawyer of his or her choice. No government should dictate to litigants which qualified lawyers they are and are not permitted to retain.”

“When the government is itself a party to the litigation, as it is in this case, the injustice is even greater,” Brett said.

Holding the detainees for the Australian Government, reportedly for hundreds of millions of dollars, Nauru is helping Australia achieve its so-called Pacific Solution.

A spokesperson for the Minister for Immigration, Amanda Vanstone, is quoted in The Age on 27 April this year as saying that the Australian Government has “nothing to do with the matter and the question of legal representation for the asylum seekers is simply a matter for the Nauruan Government”.

The acting president of the Law Institute, Bill O’Shea, said given that the Nauruan Government was detaining asylum seekers in accordance with arrangements made with the Australian Government, the case was also a matter for the Australian Government.

The Law Institute urged the federal Attorney-General to intervene by encouraging the Nauruan Government, “with the full weight of your office”, to restore the Australian lawyers’ visas so they could represent the asylum seekers.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Ruddock should intervene in Nauru: LIV
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Warning
Aug 23 2017
NT Law Society sounds alarm on mandatory sentencing
The Law Society Northern Territory has issued a warning over mandatory sentencing, saying it hasn’...
Unite
Aug 22 2017
Professionals unite in support of marriage equality
The presidents of representative bodies for solicitors, barristers and doctors in NSW have come toge...
Aug 21 2017
Is your firm on the right track for gig economy gains?
Promoted by Crowd & Co. The way we do business, where we work, how we engage with workers, ev...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...