find the latest legal job
Senior Associate - Litigation & Dispute Resolution
Category: Litigation and Dispute Resolution | Location: Melbourne CBD & Inner Suburbs Melbourne VIC
· Come work for a firm ranked in Lawyers Weekly Top 25 Attraction Firms
View details
Associate - Workplace Relations & Safety
Category: Industrial Relations and Employment Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Employer of choice · Strong team culture
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Banking and Finance Law | Location: All Perth WA
· Freelance opportunities through Vario from Pinsent Masons
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Adelaide SA
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Freelance Lawyers
Category: Other | Location: All Melbourne VIC
· • Qualified lawyer with a strong academic background
View details
Mallesons prospers from Allens IP conflict

Mallesons prospers from Allens IP conflict

A POSSIBLE client conflict within Allens Arthur Robinson’s (AAR) patent and trademark arm has led to the release of six team members, including partners Wayne McMaster and Robert Cooper, to…

A POSSIBLE client conflict within Allens Arthur Robinson’s (AAR) patent and trademark arm has led to the release of six team members, including partners Wayne McMaster and Robert Cooper, to top-tier rival Mallesons Stephen Jaques.

The unusual circumstances underlying the split surround work performed by the Melbourne-based team for pharmaceutical giant Mayne.

Qualified as a lawyer, patent and trade mark attorney, McMaster acted for the generic company prior to his 1999 switch to Allens, which also maintained deep relationships with a number of originator clients.

Generic and originator companies are strong competitors and regularly face off in the IP arena.

It is understood that McMaster’s relationship with Mayne was of late causing tension among Allens’ long-standing originator stable.

“Any conflicts between the two had been successfully managed, but it became increasingly clear that there was a real potential for conflict and therefore, for professional and ethical reasons, we decided that we could not represent particular types of generic companies that challenge pharmaceutical inventions of our originator clients,” an Allens spokesperson said.

The sextet, “effectively a core team for [Mayne] within a team”, were then released as a matter of course when Allens decided to stand by its originator clients, some of whom had used the firm for decades.

“Decisions such as these are never easy, but as we had longer standing relationships with those originator companies, those were better established,” the spokesperson added.

With Mallesons already performing a key amount of work for Mayne, the released group’s destination was made clearer.

McMaster, whose team specialises in bioscience and pharmaceuticals, added that the group wanted to remain in “the high profile patent litigation drug area”. As such, peeling off alone was not a viable option.

“In patent litigation you need significant resources behind you. The document management demands are huge and need the backing of a large firm,” he said.

The new additions boost Mallesons’ IP partnership ranks in Melbourne from three to five. Further depth is also provided by senior associates Duncan Bucknell and Shyama Jayaswal, patents counsel Carolyn Rolls and senior patents legal executive Debra Barnes. Senior Mallesons IP partners Cheng Lim and Maurice Gonsalves said that while the bulk lateral hire was “unusual for a firm like ours”, they were correspondingly excited by the prospect of working side-by-side with the new recruits.

Despite having the large and swift critical weight gain, Mallesons will continue to approach its patent and trade mark firms from within. Unlike top-tier counterparts Freehills, Blake Dawson Waldron and AAR, Mallesons harbours no immediate intentions to create a “bolt on” patent arm.

Both McMaster and Cooper, an IP litigator who spent five years in the UK with Bird & Bird, prefer an “integrated” approach, which sees attorneys and lawyers working in close physical proximity under the same practice group.

Cooper acknowledged that there was potential for the two breeds to clash and felt that a seamless strategy was the way to go.

Allens concluded by saying it “regretted the outcome”. However, the firm did not view the complicit sequence of events as a learning curve for future dealings in the patent and trade mark arena.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Mallesons prospers from Allens IP conflict
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Oct 20 2017
Podcast: One of law’s most infamous alumni – in conversation with Julian Morrow
In this episode of The Lawyers Weekly Show, Melissa Coade is joined by The Chaser’s Julian Morrow....
Oct 20 2017
High Court overturns ‘excessive’ anti-protest legislation
Bob Brown’s recent victory in the High Court over the Tasmanian government was a win for fundament...
Oct 20 2017
Changes to Australian citizenship laws blocked
Attempts to beef up the requirements to obtain Australian citizenship were thwarted this week, after...
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...