find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Real Estate & Projects Lawyer (6+ years PAE)
Category: Property Law | Location: Sydney CBD, Inner West & Eastern Suburbs Sydney NSW
· Top tier firm with offices nationally · High profile clients
View details
Discrimination: are you game?

Discrimination: are you game?

WHILE traditional board games like chess, draughts and backgammon all pit black against white, a new pastime recently arrived Down Under is attempting to teach players that colour should never…

WHILE traditional board games like chess, draughts and backgammon all pit black against white, a new pastime recently arrived Down Under is attempting to teach players that colour should never form the basis of workplace conflict.

Aside from inviting participants to come face-to-face with their attitudes towards racial disharmony, The Diversity Game also ensures senior management — including in-house counsel — are given a practical insight into potentially alienating individual markers such as gender, age, disability, religion, sexual orientation and disease.

A brain-child of consultant Heather Price, the game was last month ratified for use in local workplaces by Clayton Utz and the National Diversity Think Tank of Australia following a successful eight-year stint in post apartheid South Africa.

Not unlike Trivial Pursuit, it consists of six categories — all of which contain test questions with three multiple-choice questions. The game is ideally played by four teams, who each consider the scenarios that arise according to rolls of the dice. Teams must select their answer via consensus and present reasons justifying their stance.

According to Price, who last week road tested the game in Melbourne with representatives from Blake Dawson Waldron and Mallesons Stephen Jaques, the choices available confused even the experts.

“We’ve intentionally made all the options plausible. They are very difficult to distinguish and are separated by subtle nuances only, which leads to vigorous debate,” she said.

Such repartee is designed to make employees and employers alike actively think about underlying issues behind discriminatory practice, as opposed to being expected to absorb them via a bland seminar.

“For in-house counsel, it’s a form of preventative intervention,” she said. “Some lawyers who played the game commented that it identified scenarios that had played out in their workplace before and cost the company dearly.”

Aside from South Africa, the game has also made its mark in the US. Price said she was swayed to bring it to Australia after noticing a “big gap” between discrimination policy and procedure.

“Australia has a very good legal framework for discrimination, and an educated population that knows their rights,” she said. “It’s also a nation that is becoming more and more diverse and with that comes more potential for discrimination.”

Having adapted the game to Australian conditions for the past six months, Price is well placed to comment on the tome of local case law and statutes. Her conclusions were in part ratified by Joe Catanzariti, a senior workplace relations partner at Clayton Utz, who strongly believes law firms provide a telling snapshot of Australia’s rapidly changing face.

“More law graduates are female, but the attrition rates of women in the law is very high. While clients have become more sophisticated, there are still some out there who would prefer to be advised by men.”

“The workforce is growing older, but there’s still a perception that when you hit 50, you’re pretty much dead.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Discrimination: are you game?
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Unite
07:04
Professionals unite in support of marriage equality
The presidents of representative bodies for solicitors, barristers and doctors in NSW have come toge...
Aug 21 2017
Is your firm on the right track for gig economy gains?
Promoted by Crowd & Co. The way we do business, where we work, how we engage with workers, ev...
Scales of Justice, Victorian County Court, retiring judges
Aug 21 2017
Replacements named for retired Vic judges
Two new judicial officers have been appointed in the Victorian County Court, following the retire...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...