find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
New policy to encourage mental health discussion (1)

New policy to encourage mental health discussion (1)

Lawyers who are effectively managing mental illness will no longer have to declare their illness to the Victorian Legal Services Board (VLSB).A new policy, issued by the VLSB in December last…

Lawyers who are effectively managing mental illness will no longer have to declare their illness to the Victorian Legal Services Board (VLSB).

A new policy, issued by the VLSB in December last year, says there is "no requirement for lawyers to disclose where a condition is managed and has no impact on the lawyer's capacity to engage in legal practice".

According to Victorian Legal Services Commissioner Michael McGarvie, the new guidelines are designed to encourage lawyers to confide in others about their illness without fear of retribution.

"The Board was motivated by the reality that there is a very high level of the incidence of mental ill-health within the legal profession," McGarvie told Lawyers Weekly.

"All of the lessons from organisations like the Tristan Jepson Memorial Foundation (TJMF) or Beyond Blue say that providing an opportunity to talk and consult with friends, family, doctors and work colleagues is terribly important for the proper management of mental health."

McGarvie said he believed the existing rules around the disclosure of mental illness to the regulator, as part of the "fit and proper person" test required when renewing practising certificates, were effectively sweeping mental health issues under the carpet.

"A person suffering from depression might fear that they shouldn't tell anyone if they haven't told the regulator," explained McGarvie. "If they haven't revealed it to the regulator and they know there is a risk, or they wrongly fear there is a risk, they could lose their license by admitting that they're depressed, then why would they reveal their condition to their work colleagues, or possibly their family or their doctor?"

The new policy thus aims to clarify that lawyers suffering from anxiety, depression or other mental illness are not required to disclose this to the regulator - so long as it is not impairing the performance of their professional duties.

"The fact that you've got a mental illness, that it's being managed and is recognised - and it's not impairing you - is of no interest to the Victorian regulator," said McGarvie.

"The policy is designed to relieve practitioners from feeling as if they can't talk to work colleagues about an illness."

McGarvie said the policy change had drawn some criticism from those who questioned its utility in light of impending national profession reform, which is due to come into effect in July 2013.

"There has been talk about the national regulator coming into operation for many years ... but you can't stop doing things or issuing guidance notes or assisting practitioners deal with their regulatory obligations and do nothing until the new system arrives," he said.

"A national board will form its own view about how much or how little to issue guidance notes to assist the profession to determine what they should or should not disclose ... but we formed a view here that it was in the interests of both consumers and lawyers that this policy were continued until the end of the role of the Board."

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

New policy to encourage mental health discussion (1)
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
LCA president Fiona McLeod SC
Aug 17 2017
Where social fault lines meet the justice gap in Aus
After just returning from a tour of the Northern Territory, LCA president Fiona McLeod SC speaks wit...
Marriage equality flag
Aug 17 2017
ALHR backs High Court challenge to marriage equality postal vote
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (ALHR) has voiced its support for a constitutional challenge to ...
Give advice
Aug 17 2017
A-G issues advice on judiciary’s public presence
Commonwealth Attorney-General George Brandis QC has offered his advice on the public presence of jud...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...