find the latest legal job
Corporate Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Highly-respected, innovative and entrepreneurial Not-for-Profit · Competency based Board
View details
Chief Counsel and Company Secretary
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: Newcastle, Maitland & Hunter NSW
· Dynamic, high growth organisation · ASX listed market leader
View details
In-house Projects Lawyer | Renewables / Solar | 2-5 Years PQE
Category: Generalists - In House | Location: All Australia
· Help design the future · NASDAQ Listed
View details
Insurance Lawyer (3-5 PAE)
Category: Insurance and Superannuation Law | Location: Brisbane CBD & Inner Suburbs Brisbane QLD
· Dynamic organisation ·
View details
Legal Counsel
Category: Corporate and Commercial Law | Location: North Sydney NSW 2060
· 18 month fixed term contract · 3-5 years PQE with TMT exposure
View details
Principal warns against ASIC (1)

Principal warns against ASIC (1)

The lawyer leading the class action on behalf of Storm investors has warned his clients that opting out of his class action proceedings in favour of action initiated by ASIC is a dangerous…

The lawyer leading the class action on behalf of Storm investors has warned his clients that opting out of his class action proceedings in favour of action initiated by ASIC is a dangerous move.

Stewart Levitt, principal of Levitt Robinson Solicitors, said ASIC's failure to warn investors about obtaining independent legal advice in 2007, despite the regulator being aware of Storm's flawed model, shows a compromised ability to deal with the situation.

"It's important that clients recognise that if they put all their eggs in the ASIC basket, ASIC might just drop the basket at any stage .... ASIC have demonstrated that they can't be relied upon in relation to this entire enterprise," Levitt told Lawyers Weekly.

Mediation is scheduled for the end of February for all parties involved in the Storm Financial debacle and despite Levitt Robison and ASIC being on the "the same side" in terms of a resolution for investors, Levitt said he will not forget the regulator's failures.

"Just because you have an alliance with somebody doesn't mean that everything that happens should be swept under carpet," he said.

In early November 2007, after ASIC approved the Storm Financial Prospectus, the regulator's compliance team performed a full audit of Storm's method of doing business.

Levitt claims to have emails, obtained outside the discovery process, sent between Storm and ASIC which indicate that Storm's North Sydney office was fully audited.

"They show that ASIC was fully aware of how Storm operated and did nothing about it," said Levitt, adding that most of the damage was done between November 2007 and August 2008.

"ASIC blame all the banks now, but the fact is they fully audited the whole Storm model in 2007 and gave them a silver star. Why did they stand by when people signed their life away?"

After the collapse of Storm, CBA and Slater & Gordon jointly promoted the CBA Storm Resolution Scheme, which Levitt described as "a hardship scheme which did not recognise that the bank had done anything wrong legally".

"CBA was paying Slater & Gordon, who were co-authors of the offers, and S&G were telling clients it was a good deal. Where is the independence in that?

"ASIC now, by necessary interference, has recognised that that wasn't appropriate, yet they stood by and let it all happen and consequently the bank didn't adequately compensate people."

The corporate watchdog has defended accusations that it should have done more to prevent the collapse after Storm Financial went into administration in January 2009.

More than 400 Storm clients were affected after the Federal Court ordered the company's winding up in March 2009 due to debts of about $80 million.

Like this story? Read more:

QLS condemns actions of disgraced lawyer as ‘stain on the profession’

NSW proposes big justice reforms to target risk of reoffending

The legal budget breakdown 2017

Principal warns against ASIC (1)
lawyersweekly logo
Promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
more from lawyers weekly
Scales of Justice
Aug 16 2017
Urgent criminal law reforms can prevent ‘unwarranted acquittals’
Concerns about unfair prejudice arising from the use of tendency and coincidence evidence are mispla...
Aug 15 2017
Press Control-S on your firm
Promoted by BHL Software It’s now a truism that when your IT systems stop working, so does you...
Aug 15 2017
The Importance of Leadership Skills for Aspiring Lawyers
Promoted by LHD Lawyers Even the most prominent lawyers of our age (or ages past, for that matter...
APPOINTMENTS
Allens managing partner Richard Spurio, image courtesy Allens' website
Jun 21 2017
Promo season at Allens
A group of lawyers at Allens have received promotions across its PNG and Australian offices. ...
May 11 2017
Partner exits for in-house role
A Victorian lawyer has left the partnership of a national firm to start a new gig with state governm...
Esteban Gomez
May 11 2017
National firm recruits ‘major asset’
A national law firm has announced it has appointed a new corporate partner who brings over 15 years'...
opinion
Nicole Rich
May 16 2017
Access to justice for young transgender Australians
Reform is looming for the process that young transgender Australians and their families must current...
Geoff Roberson
May 11 2017
The lighter side of the law: when law and comedy collide
On the face of it, there doesn’t seem to be much that is amusing about the law, writes Geoff Rober...
Help
May 10 2017
Advocate’s immunity – without fear or without favour but not both
On 29 March 2017, the High Court handed down its decision in David Kendirjian v Eugene Lepore & ...